Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15971 - 15980 of 40042 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 15971 - 15980 of 40042 for financial disclosure statement.
COURT OF APPEALS
. We find that, in context, the city attorney’s statements lack probative value as to the issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80711 - 2012-04-10
. We find that, in context, the city attorney’s statements lack probative value as to the issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80711 - 2012-04-10
State v. James Tanksley
of proof that states an evidentiary hypothesis bolstered by a statement of fact sufficient to justify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18618 - 2005-06-20
of proof that states an evidentiary hypothesis bolstered by a statement of fact sufficient to justify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18618 - 2005-06-20
[PDF]
Dean Deback v. James E. White
an improper statement made by DeBack’s counsel in opening statements; (3) Judge McGraw erred by failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10332 - 2017-09-20
an improper statement made by DeBack’s counsel in opening statements; (3) Judge McGraw erred by failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10332 - 2017-09-20
Dean Deback v. James E. White
; (2) Judge McGraw erred in failing to declare a mistrial following an improper statement made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10332 - 2005-03-31
; (2) Judge McGraw erred in failing to declare a mistrial following an improper statement made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10332 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, but on slightly different grounds. We find that, in context, the city attorney’s statements lack probative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80711 - 2014-09-15
, but on slightly different grounds. We find that, in context, the city attorney’s statements lack probative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80711 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
-Goodchild[3] motion because his incriminating statements given to police were not knowingly and voluntarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36452 - 2009-05-11
-Goodchild[3] motion because his incriminating statements given to police were not knowingly and voluntarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36452 - 2009-05-11
[PDF]
statements about Mitchell’s criminal history. Y.Z. stated that Mitchell “got nailed with” a “girl
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955853 - 2025-05-15
statements about Mitchell’s criminal history. Y.Z. stated that Mitchell “got nailed with” a “girl
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955853 - 2025-05-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that the presentence report writer recommended consecutive terms. Klein called the prosecutor’s statement “an end
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1064312 - 2026-01-21
that the presentence report writer recommended consecutive terms. Klein called the prosecutor’s statement “an end
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1064312 - 2026-01-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that the presentence report writer recommended consecutive terms. Klein called the prosecutor’s statement “an end
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1064312 - 2026-01-21
that the presentence report writer recommended consecutive terms. Klein called the prosecutor’s statement “an end
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1064312 - 2026-01-21
Linda Premeau v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
, under Wis. Admin. Code § DWD 80.24, as a “statement … taken by a recording device.” The commission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2201 - 2005-03-31
, under Wis. Admin. Code § DWD 80.24, as a “statement … taken by a recording device.” The commission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2201 - 2005-03-31