Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15991 - 16000 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Search results 15991 - 16000 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Francesca Poulin v. Indian Community School
, is a question of law that we review de novo. See id., 221 Wis. 2d at 639, 585 N.W.2d at 591. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15211 - 2005-03-31
, is a question of law that we review de novo. See id., 221 Wis. 2d at 639, 585 N.W.2d at 591. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15211 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
1, 8, 434 N.W.2d 609 (1989). First, we review de novo the legal question of whether the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104656 - 2013-11-20
1, 8, 434 N.W.2d 609 (1989). First, we review de novo the legal question of whether the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104656 - 2013-11-20
State v. Chester Hill
was impermissibly suggestive. This is a constitutional question that we decide de novo. State v. Kaelin, 196 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9830 - 2005-03-31
was impermissibly suggestive. This is a constitutional question that we decide de novo. State v. Kaelin, 196 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9830 - 2005-03-31
State v. James R. Boardman
will consider de novo whether the circuit court has erred in the application of law to undisputed facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13084 - 2005-03-31
will consider de novo whether the circuit court has erred in the application of law to undisputed facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13084 - 2005-03-31
State v. Frankie Groenke
. Our review on this issue is de novo because the trial court that decided the new trial motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11724 - 2005-03-31
. Our review on this issue is de novo because the trial court that decided the new trial motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11724 - 2005-03-31
State v. David N. Burkhart
. ¶8 If we were to decide de novo whether the foregoing facts constituted probable cause, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16264 - 2005-03-31
. ¶8 If we were to decide de novo whether the foregoing facts constituted probable cause, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16264 - 2005-03-31
Production Stamping Corporation v. Maryland Casualty Company
granting summary judgment. See id. ¶9 We review the trial court’s decision de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14453 - 2005-03-31
granting summary judgment. See id. ¶9 We review the trial court’s decision de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14453 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, which we review de novo. Moats, 156 Wis. 2d at 101. ¶5 Postconviction, Laboy argued that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90288 - 2012-12-11
, which we review de novo. Moats, 156 Wis. 2d at 101. ¶5 Postconviction, Laboy argued that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90288 - 2012-12-11
Timothy J. Lipke v. Tri-County Area School Board
). This is a question that we decide de novo, without deference to the trial court’s determination. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12594 - 2005-03-31
). This is a question that we decide de novo, without deference to the trial court’s determination. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12594 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
facts which would entitle the defendant to relief. Id. This is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121168 - 2014-09-08
facts which would entitle the defendant to relief. Id. This is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121168 - 2014-09-08