Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15991 - 16000 of 30134 for consulta de causas.

Kevin J. Kollock v. City of Cumberland Zoning Board of Appeals
, it is ambiguous. Id. Whether an ordinance is ambiguous is a question of law we review de novo. See Boltz v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7446 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
subject to de novo review. Colstad, 260 Wis. 2d 406, ¶8. ¶13 Tomaw argues that the information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108721 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
or other duties is a question of law that we review de novo. See Brown, 293 Wis. 2d 594, ¶21. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29782 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
“reviewed all the records for this account” and “ma[de] this Affidavit based upon personal knowledge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94377 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. John D. Meindl
, which we review de novo. County of Dane v. Winsand, 2004 WI App 86, ¶5, 271 Wis. 2d 786, 679 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18687 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
an evidentiary hearing. MacKay appeals. ¶7 We consider de novo whether a postconviction motion on its face
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89102 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
in a way that denied a defendant due process is a question of constitutional fact we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91825 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law that we review de novo. Dane County DHS v. Ponn P., 2005 WI 32, ¶14, 279 Wis. 2d 169, 694
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64232 - 2011-05-17

Micah Oriedo v. Wisconsin Personnel Commission
of a statute may be accorded great weight deference, due weight deference or de novo review, depending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4059 - 2005-03-31

WI App 15 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP599-CR Complete Titl...
principles to the findings of fact de novo. Id. Further, we are not constrained to the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58245 - 2011-01-30