Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15991 - 16000 of 30150 for consulta de causas.
Search results 15991 - 16000 of 30150 for consulta de causas.
Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6205 - 2005-03-31
lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6205 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jasen Duane Dosh
, whether the defendant’s Miranda rights were violated is a constitutional fact that is reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12664 - 2005-03-31
, whether the defendant’s Miranda rights were violated is a constitutional fact that is reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12664 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the facts satisfy the statutory standard is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id. (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033397 - 2025-11-04
the facts satisfy the statutory standard is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id. (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033397 - 2025-11-04
COURT OF APPEALS
accept the court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, and we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53254 - 2010-08-11
accept the court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, and we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53254 - 2010-08-11
Alison M. Welin v. Elizabeth A. Pyrzynski
facts, all questions of law, which we review de novo. Van Erden v. Sobczak, 2004 WI App 40, ¶¶11, 22
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18589 - 2005-06-15
facts, all questions of law, which we review de novo. Van Erden v. Sobczak, 2004 WI App 40, ¶¶11, 22
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18589 - 2005-06-15
COURT OF APPEALS
). Whether an officer has probable cause to administer a PBT “is a legal issue that we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135400 - 2015-02-18
). Whether an officer has probable cause to administer a PBT “is a legal issue that we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135400 - 2015-02-18
State v. Jesse Ruiz
review de novo. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d at 309-10. If the motion raises such facts, the [trial] court must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25413 - 2006-06-05
review de novo. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d at 309-10. If the motion raises such facts, the [trial] court must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25413 - 2006-06-05
COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law that this court decides de novo. Ibid. First, the defendant must show that counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95505 - 2013-04-15
a question of law that this court decides de novo. Ibid. First, the defendant must show that counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95505 - 2013-04-15
COURT OF APPEALS
entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36772 - 2009-06-15
entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36772 - 2009-06-15
[PDF]
Luetzow Industries v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
of § 77.54(6)(b), STATS., raises an issue of law that we review de novo pursuant to § 227.57(5), STATS.4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7958 - 2017-09-19
of § 77.54(6)(b), STATS., raises an issue of law that we review de novo pursuant to § 227.57(5), STATS.4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7958 - 2017-09-19