Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 161 - 170 of 63251 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 161 - 170 of 63251 for Motion for joint custody.
[MS WORD]
FA-4100V: Basic Guide to Divorce - Generic Version
legal custody. Joint legal custody means that neither parent's legal custody rights are superior, except
/formdisplay/FA-4100V_instructions.doc?formNumber=FA-4100V&formType=Instructions&formatId=1&language=en - 2025-02-24
legal custody. Joint legal custody means that neither parent's legal custody rights are superior, except
/formdisplay/FA-4100V_instructions.doc?formNumber=FA-4100V&formType=Instructions&formatId=1&language=en - 2025-02-24
[PDF]
FA-4100;Basic Guide to Divorce
legal custody. Joint legal custody means that neither parent's legal custody rights are superior, except
/formdisplay/FA-4100V_instructions.pdf?formNumber=FA-4100V&formType=Instructions&formatId=2&language=en - 2025-02-24
legal custody. Joint legal custody means that neither parent's legal custody rights are superior, except
/formdisplay/FA-4100V_instructions.pdf?formNumber=FA-4100V&formType=Instructions&formatId=2&language=en - 2025-02-24
Jeffrey Samson v. Mary Samson
, property division, the denial of maintenance and the award of joint legal custody. We conclude the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14354 - 2005-03-31
, property division, the denial of maintenance and the award of joint legal custody. We conclude the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14354 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Jeffrey Samson v. Mary Samson
division, the denial of maintenance and the award of joint legal custody. We conclude the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14354 - 2014-09-15
division, the denial of maintenance and the award of joint legal custody. We conclude the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14354 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Rosemary G. O'Brien v. Craig P. O'Brien
that this order is inconsistent with the concept of joint legal custody and that there is no evidence that she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14679 - 2017-09-21
that this order is inconsistent with the concept of joint legal custody and that there is no evidence that she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14679 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
Mastrodonato appeals[1] from an order dismissing his motion to modify custody, physical placement and child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57031 - 2010-11-22
Mastrodonato appeals[1] from an order dismissing his motion to modify custody, physical placement and child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57031 - 2010-11-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
¶1 PER CURIAM. Anthony Mastrodonato appeals1 from an order dismissing his motion to modify custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57031 - 2014-09-15
¶1 PER CURIAM. Anthony Mastrodonato appeals1 from an order dismissing his motion to modify custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57031 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. Scott argues that the court erred by (1) awarding Scott and Robin joint legal custody and equal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29235 - 2007-05-30
. Scott argues that the court erred by (1) awarding Scott and Robin joint legal custody and equal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29235 - 2007-05-30
[PDF]
NOTICE
Scott and Robin joint legal custody and equal placement of the Nylands’ daughter because the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29235 - 2014-09-15
Scott and Robin joint legal custody and equal placement of the Nylands’ daughter because the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29235 - 2014-09-15
Nancy M. Keller v. Michael J. Keller, Sr.
the following….” The stipulation provided for joint custody and shared physical placement and “[i]n the event
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11564 - 2005-03-31
the following….” The stipulation provided for joint custody and shared physical placement and “[i]n the event
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11564 - 2005-03-31