Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 161 - 170 of 25809 for bench warrant/1000.
Search results 161 - 170 of 25809 for bench warrant/1000.
State v. Mary E. Gruber
several times after the fire, including once while executing a search warrant to look for certain items
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21619 - 2006-03-01
several times after the fire, including once while executing a search warrant to look for certain items
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21619 - 2006-03-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
excluded at his bench trial based on the State’s alleged violation of the applicable discovery statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=898617 - 2025-01-08
excluded at his bench trial based on the State’s alleged violation of the applicable discovery statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=898617 - 2025-01-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
424 (1996) (appellate court need not discuss arguments unless they have “sufficient merit to warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=229414 - 2018-12-06
424 (1996) (appellate court need not discuss arguments unless they have “sufficient merit to warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=229414 - 2018-12-06
Elaine C. Socha v. James Socha
trust on the total amount of the benefits under the policies, less $1000.[1] It is from this judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9202 - 2005-03-31
trust on the total amount of the benefits under the policies, less $1000.[1] It is from this judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9202 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Delores M. Johnson v. Thomas A. Gulseth
in this case was common to both parties’ deeds. We think this circumstance warranted reformation. ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2239 - 2017-09-19
in this case was common to both parties’ deeds. We think this circumstance warranted reformation. ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2239 - 2017-09-19
State v. Ollie H. Christopher, Jr.
convicting him of possession of cocaine with intent to deliver within 1000 feet of a park and of obstructing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11996 - 2005-03-31
convicting him of possession of cocaine with intent to deliver within 1000 feet of a park and of obstructing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11996 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). No. 2022AP678-CR 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Michael K. Brooks appeals a judgment, entered after a bench trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=673292 - 2023-07-05
). No. 2022AP678-CR 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Michael K. Brooks appeals a judgment, entered after a bench trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=673292 - 2023-07-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to demonstrate “extraordinary circumstances” warranting relief from the judgment. Accordingly, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=198723 - 2017-10-24
to demonstrate “extraordinary circumstances” warranting relief from the judgment. Accordingly, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=198723 - 2017-10-24
State v. Mohammad R. Abu-Saif
search warrant executed at his place of business, claiming that the expected transaction described
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11770 - 2005-03-31
search warrant executed at his place of business, claiming that the expected transaction described
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11770 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Giniene P. Quick
was convicted of one count of delivering a controlled substance (tetrahydrocannabinol or THC) within 1000 feet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10095 - 2017-09-19
was convicted of one count of delivering a controlled substance (tetrahydrocannabinol or THC) within 1000 feet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10095 - 2017-09-19