Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 161 - 170 of 15294 for probate.
Search results 161 - 170 of 15294 for probate.
State v. Steven D. Cathey
court placed Cathey on probation for two years. The probations were to run concurrently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11189 - 2005-03-31
court placed Cathey on probation for two years. The probations were to run concurrently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11189 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI App 19
and executed for probation purposes at the No. 2016AP500-CR 2 request of and on behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183522 - 2018-02-13
and executed for probation purposes at the No. 2016AP500-CR 2 request of and on behalf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183522 - 2018-02-13
[PDF]
NOTICE
years on probation, Genge failed to meet the rehabilitative goals of probation. ¶2 In 2007, Genge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45888 - 2014-09-15
years on probation, Genge failed to meet the rehabilitative goals of probation. ¶2 In 2007, Genge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45888 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Rick A. Walz
vehicle while intoxicated, while he was on probation for another crime. Walz’s probation agent placed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25623 - 2017-09-21
vehicle while intoxicated, while he was on probation for another crime. Walz’s probation agent placed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25623 - 2017-09-21
State v. James Brownson
his probation and by rejecting his motion to withdraw his no contest pleas. We hold that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11828 - 2005-03-31
his probation and by rejecting his motion to withdraw his no contest pleas. We hold that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11828 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James Brownson
probation and by rejecting his motion to withdraw his no contest pleas. We hold that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11828 - 2017-09-21
probation and by rejecting his motion to withdraw his no contest pleas. We hold that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11828 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Brandon L. Wheat
to No. 01-2224-CR 2 timely file a motion to suppress evidence found during a probation search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4315 - 2017-09-19
to No. 01-2224-CR 2 timely file a motion to suppress evidence found during a probation search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4315 - 2017-09-19
State v. Brandon L. Wheat
because he failed to timely file a motion to suppress evidence found during a probation search of Wheat’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4315 - 2005-03-31
because he failed to timely file a motion to suppress evidence found during a probation search of Wheat’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4315 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
representative of the Estate. While the Florida probate action was pending, Hammarback filed an action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=978002 - 2025-07-01
representative of the Estate. While the Florida probate action was pending, Hammarback filed an action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=978002 - 2025-07-01
[PDF]
State v. Gary J. Hazen
, because he had already served a one-year jail sentence as a condition of probation. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2770 - 2017-09-19
, because he had already served a one-year jail sentence as a condition of probation. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2770 - 2017-09-19