Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 161 - 170 of 58340 for speedy trial.
Search results 161 - 170 of 58340 for speedy trial.
State v. Pharoah Vernon Morris
not receive a speedy trial, in violation of the Wisconsin and United States Constitutions. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2222 - 2005-03-31
not receive a speedy trial, in violation of the Wisconsin and United States Constitutions. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2222 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for postconviction relief. The issue is whether his constitutional right to a speedy trial was violated. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192405 - 2017-09-21
for postconviction relief. The issue is whether his constitutional right to a speedy trial was violated. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192405 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the charges against him on the ground that his right to a speedy trial had been violated. We affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184080 - 2017-09-21
the charges against him on the ground that his right to a speedy trial had been violated. We affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184080 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Edward D. Anderson
. He submits that: (1) his constitutional right to a speedy trial was violated; (2) his due process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19746 - 2017-09-21
. He submits that: (1) his constitutional right to a speedy trial was violated; (2) his due process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19746 - 2017-09-21
State v. Edward D. Anderson
submits that: (1) his constitutional right to a speedy trial was violated; (2) his due process rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19746 - 2005-09-26
submits that: (1) his constitutional right to a speedy trial was violated; (2) his due process rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19746 - 2005-09-26
State v. Daniel T. Raymond
that the trial court denied his right to a speedy trial. Alternatively, Raymond argues that the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5301 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court denied his right to a speedy trial. Alternatively, Raymond argues that the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5301 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Daniel T. Raymond
to a speedy trial. Alternatively, Raymond argues that the evidence was insufficient to support the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5301 - 2017-09-19
to a speedy trial. Alternatively, Raymond argues that the evidence was insufficient to support the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5301 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
violation of his right to a speedy trial. We affirm. I. ¶2 On November 9, 11, and 17, 2004, there were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44860 - 2014-09-15
violation of his right to a speedy trial. We affirm. I. ¶2 On November 9, 11, and 17, 2004, there were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44860 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of the charges against him because of an alleged violation of his right to a speedy trial. We affirm. I. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44860 - 2009-12-21
of the charges against him because of an alleged violation of his right to a speedy trial. We affirm. I. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44860 - 2009-12-21
State v. Vernon H. Walker
in issuing a related search warrant; (2) adjourning Walker’s speedy trial; (3) condoning prosecutorial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25837 - 2006-08-29
in issuing a related search warrant; (2) adjourning Walker’s speedy trial; (3) condoning prosecutorial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25837 - 2006-08-29