Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 161 - 170 of 559 for widths.
Search results 161 - 170 of 559 for widths.
Alton B. Ison, Jr. v. Lucille V. Nefstead
that, if read literally, would be impossible. The deed describes the driveway as “30 feet in width
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14562 - 2005-03-31
that, if read literally, would be impossible. The deed describes the driveway as “30 feet in width
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14562 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to observe the vehicle and then saw the vehicle drive into the oncoming traffic lane by half the car width
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56707 - 2010-11-15
to observe the vehicle and then saw the vehicle drive into the oncoming traffic lane by half the car width
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56707 - 2010-11-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in width for the purpose of ingress and egress to the existing boat channel.” The Association
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=305594 - 2020-11-18
in width for the purpose of ingress and egress to the existing boat channel.” The Association
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=305594 - 2020-11-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that Udelhofen violated, and because the State failed to present evidence of the actual width of Stage Road
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173182 - 2017-09-21
that Udelhofen violated, and because the State failed to present evidence of the actual width of Stage Road
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173182 - 2017-09-21
Anton H. Turrittin v. Town of La Pointe
). This case is not controlling because it refers only to the width of the highway. See § 80.01(2), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13114 - 2005-03-31
). This case is not controlling because it refers only to the width of the highway. See § 80.01(2), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13114 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Anton H. Turrittin v. Town of La Pointe
is not controlling because it refers only to the width of the highway. See § 80.01(2), STATS., referring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13114 - 2017-09-21
is not controlling because it refers only to the width of the highway. See § 80.01(2), STATS., referring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13114 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
that, upon all roadways of sufficient width, drivers “shall drive on the right half of the roadway
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33681 - 2008-08-06
that, upon all roadways of sufficient width, drivers “shall drive on the right half of the roadway
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33681 - 2008-08-06
COURT OF APPEALS
width of boundary highways). Further, Wis. Stat. § 349.03(4)—not cited by either party—authorizes law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48303 - 2010-03-29
width of boundary highways). Further, Wis. Stat. § 349.03(4)—not cited by either party—authorizes law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48303 - 2010-03-29
Jaime (Persike-Larsen) Radtke v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
all roadways of sufficient width the operator of a vehicle shall drive on the right half
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12024 - 2005-03-31
all roadways of sufficient width the operator of a vehicle shall drive on the right half
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12024 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Alton B. Ison, Jr. v. Lucille V. Nefstead
literally, would be impossible. The deed describes the driveway as “30 feet in width
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14562 - 2017-09-21
literally, would be impossible. The deed describes the driveway as “30 feet in width
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14562 - 2017-09-21