Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1601 - 1610 of 69114 for he.
Search results 1601 - 1610 of 69114 for he.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that denied Cooper’s motion to be relieved of sex offender registry requirements. Cooper contends that he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194371 - 2017-09-21
that denied Cooper’s motion to be relieved of sex offender registry requirements. Cooper contends that he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194371 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jason T. Hutchins
consent. See § 943.23(3), Stats. He also appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13536 - 2005-03-31
consent. See § 943.23(3), Stats. He also appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13536 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to repeated sexual assault of the same child as a persistent repeater. He also appeals from the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74945 - 2014-09-15
to repeated sexual assault of the same child as a persistent repeater. He also appeals from the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74945 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Adam J. Nelson
of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated, third offense. He also appeals an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7548 - 2017-09-19
of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated, third offense. He also appeals an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7548 - 2017-09-19
State v. Carl Andre Brown
for party to the crime of felony murder. He claims that his statements to police should have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7043 - 2005-03-31
for party to the crime of felony murder. He claims that his statements to police should have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7043 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that Gilmour is not entitled to withdraw his plea because he has failed to credibly establish that his plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83842 - 2012-06-19
that Gilmour is not entitled to withdraw his plea because he has failed to credibly establish that his plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83842 - 2012-06-19
State v. John Edward Kraemer
sexual assault of a child, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 948.02(2).[1] He argues the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18188 - 2005-05-16
sexual assault of a child, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 948.02(2).[1] He argues the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18188 - 2005-05-16
[PDF]
State v. John Edward Kraemer
. No. 2004AP2075-CR 2 § 948.02(2). 1 He argues the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18188 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2004AP2075-CR 2 § 948.02(2). 1 He argues the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18188 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
for postconviction relief. Nash argues he is entitled to a new trial on grounds he was denied effective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79080 - 2012-03-05
for postconviction relief. Nash argues he is entitled to a new trial on grounds he was denied effective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79080 - 2012-03-05
COURT OF APPEALS
he received Miranda[1] warnings. Streicher renews his suppression claim on appeal. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140999 - 2015-05-05
he received Miranda[1] warnings. Streicher renews his suppression claim on appeal. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140999 - 2015-05-05