Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16001 - 16010 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Search results 16001 - 16010 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
COURT OF APPEALS
of the $2500 necessary to convict him of a Class C felony. We review de novo whether a court had subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36249 - 2009-04-28
of the $2500 necessary to convict him of a Class C felony. We review de novo whether a court had subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36249 - 2009-04-28
COURT OF APPEALS
Droegkamp is a “prevailing” party is a question of law that we review de novo. See Shadley v. Lloyds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69856 - 2011-08-16
Droegkamp is a “prevailing” party is a question of law that we review de novo. See Shadley v. Lloyds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69856 - 2011-08-16
State v. Lawrence Williams
proceedings by § 972.11(1), Stats.). We review de novo, however, the trial court's findings of constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12432 - 2005-03-31
proceedings by § 972.11(1), Stats.). We review de novo, however, the trial court's findings of constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12432 - 2005-03-31
Mortgage Lenders Network v. Sandra J. Wangert-Fitzgerald
. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶7 We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7273 - 2005-03-31
. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶7 We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7273 - 2005-03-31
Firstar Trust Company v. Richard D. Gebhardt
. DISCUSSION We review a decision to grant summary judgment de novo. See Grosskopf Oil
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13072 - 2005-03-31
. DISCUSSION We review a decision to grant summary judgment de novo. See Grosskopf Oil
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13072 - 2005-03-31
Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6217 - 2005-03-31
lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6217 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). “Sufficiency of the motion is a question of law, which we review de novo.” State v. Balliette, 2011 WI 79
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194499 - 2017-09-21
). “Sufficiency of the motion is a question of law, which we review de novo.” State v. Balliette, 2011 WI 79
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194499 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo. See Brenda B., 331 Wis. 2d 310, ¶¶26-27. A circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76202 - 2014-09-15
is a question of law that we review de novo. See Brenda B., 331 Wis. 2d 310, ¶¶26-27. A circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76202 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a legal determination that this court decides de novo. Id. We need not address both components
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=338502 - 2021-02-23
a legal determination that this court decides de novo. Id. We need not address both components
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=338502 - 2021-02-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
interpretation presents a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. Konneker v. Romano, 2010 WI 65
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142503 - 2017-09-21
interpretation presents a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. Konneker v. Romano, 2010 WI 65
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142503 - 2017-09-21