Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16001 - 16010 of 97721 for court records search online.
Search results 16001 - 16010 of 97721 for court records search online.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. was 2 Arendt concedes that even if the trial court’s on-the-record explanation was insufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104361 - 2017-09-21
. was 2 Arendt concedes that even if the trial court’s on-the-record explanation was insufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104361 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of a type of mixed property). On this record, the circuit court’s finding that the parties did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196615 - 2017-09-21
of a type of mixed property). On this record, the circuit court’s finding that the parties did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196615 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 21, 2020 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=297207 - 2020-10-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 21, 2020 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=297207 - 2020-10-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and the attachments line by line on the record.” Ellis again answered, “Yes, your Honor.” The court further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=372620 - 2021-06-02
and the attachments line by line on the record.” Ellis again answered, “Yes, your Honor.” The court further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=372620 - 2021-06-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the facts in the record.” Id. II. The trial court’s decision to exclude Busby’s testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201481 - 2017-11-14
of the facts in the record.” Id. II. The trial court’s decision to exclude Busby’s testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201481 - 2017-11-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on the trial date unprepared to proceed. ¶17 The record supports the circuit court’s findings. Schmidt made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193668 - 2017-09-21
on the trial date unprepared to proceed. ¶17 The record supports the circuit court’s findings. Schmidt made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193668 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 7, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144102 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 7, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144102 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 16, 2017 Diane M. Fremgen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184629 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 16, 2017 Diane M. Fremgen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184629 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Based on the facts found by the court and summarized above, we conclude that the record supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142990 - 2017-09-21
. Based on the facts found by the court and summarized above, we conclude that the record supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142990 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 980.09(2) has since been amended and now requires the court to deny the petition unless “the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192264 - 2017-09-21
. § 980.09(2) has since been amended and now requires the court to deny the petition unless “the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192264 - 2017-09-21