Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16011 - 16020 of 64566 for b's.
Search results 16011 - 16020 of 64566 for b's.
COURT OF APPEALS
be revoked despite signing the form. ¶8 Wisconsin Stat. § 973.09(3)(b) sets a unique procedure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57415 - 2010-12-06
be revoked despite signing the form. ¶8 Wisconsin Stat. § 973.09(3)(b) sets a unique procedure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57415 - 2010-12-06
State v. James A. Albright
, and/or (b) provide direct evidence that Mr. Albright was not under the influence of an intoxicant.” However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4382 - 2005-03-31
, and/or (b) provide direct evidence that Mr. Albright was not under the influence of an intoxicant.” However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4382 - 2005-03-31
State v. Will James Robinson, Jr.
challenges two of the charges. First, he challenges his kidnapping conviction under Wis. Stat. § 940.31(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24660 - 2006-03-29
challenges two of the charges. First, he challenges his kidnapping conviction under Wis. Stat. § 940.31(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24660 - 2006-03-29
CA Blank Order
. 2d at 262; see also § 971.08(1)(b) (the court shall “[m]ake such inquiry as satisfies
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93566 - 2013-03-05
. 2d at 262; see also § 971.08(1)(b) (the court shall “[m]ake such inquiry as satisfies
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93566 - 2013-03-05
[PDF]
County of Rock v. Sandra K. Hintz
., ¶32. (“[B]y revealing that he or she was in a particular vehicle, the informant understood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21515 - 2017-09-21
., ¶32. (“[B]y revealing that he or she was in a particular vehicle, the informant understood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21515 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Orbbie Williams
a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: JOHN J. DI MOTTO and MICHAEL B. BRENNAN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19806 - 2017-09-21
a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: JOHN J. DI MOTTO and MICHAEL B. BRENNAN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19806 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jose G. Araujo
)(b)4, Stats. [1] The plea agreement Araujo initialed and signed included the standard language
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10980 - 2005-03-31
)(b)4, Stats. [1] The plea agreement Araujo initialed and signed included the standard language
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10980 - 2005-03-31
Melvina Young v. John S. Wright
-APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane County: paul b. higginbotham, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10661 - 2005-03-31
-APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane County: paul b. higginbotham, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10661 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
)(b)4., (3). ¶9 This particular issue is also not one reasonably likely to be repeated yet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194719 - 2017-09-21
)(b)4., (3). ¶9 This particular issue is also not one reasonably likely to be repeated yet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194719 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
in violation of WIS. STAT. § 48.35(1)(b)1. (1995-96). The “new factor” was that the trial court, and all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28147 - 2014-09-15
in violation of WIS. STAT. § 48.35(1)(b)1. (1995-96). The “new factor” was that the trial court, and all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28147 - 2014-09-15