Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16011 - 16020 of 30191 for de.
Search results 16011 - 16020 of 30191 for de.
State v. Ronald C. Foust
the application of constitutional standards to undisputed facts. It is thus a question of law, which we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12105 - 2005-03-31
the application of constitutional standards to undisputed facts. It is thus a question of law, which we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12105 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
(Ct. App. 1998). Whether a written instrument is ambiguous is a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31262 - 2007-12-19
(Ct. App. 1998). Whether a written instrument is ambiguous is a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31262 - 2007-12-19
Michael Hook v. William A. Bonner and Judith L. Bonner
is a question of law we review de novo.”[2] Soc’y Ins. v. Town of Franklin, 2000 WI App 35, ¶5, 233 Wis. 2d 207
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5538 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law we review de novo.”[2] Soc’y Ins. v. Town of Franklin, 2000 WI App 35, ¶5, 233 Wis. 2d 207
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5538 - 2005-03-31
State v. Chris C. Lichtenberg
to a speedy trial has been violated is a constitutional question we review de novo, although we will uphold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5602 - 2005-03-31
to a speedy trial has been violated is a constitutional question we review de novo, although we will uphold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5602 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, would entitle the defendant to relief. This is a question of law that [appellate courts] review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123252 - 2014-10-06
, would entitle the defendant to relief. This is a question of law that [appellate courts] review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123252 - 2014-10-06
Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital, Inc. v. Jerome B. Mueller
. A. Summary judgment. Our standard of review for summary judgment questions is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9105 - 2005-03-31
. A. Summary judgment. Our standard of review for summary judgment questions is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9105 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
judgment decisions de novo, applying the same legal standard and methodology employed by the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=999800 - 2025-08-26
judgment decisions de novo, applying the same legal standard and methodology employed by the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=999800 - 2025-08-26
State v. T.J. International, Inc.
deferring to the department’s determination. We also review the circuit court’s statutory interpretation de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16147 - 2005-03-31
deferring to the department’s determination. We also review the circuit court’s statutory interpretation de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16147 - 2005-03-31
State v. Anthony Hicks
. DISCUSSION The constitutionality of a statute is reviewed de novo. State v. McManus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8137 - 2005-03-31
. DISCUSSION The constitutionality of a statute is reviewed de novo. State v. McManus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8137 - 2005-03-31
Lincoln Savings Bank v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
decision, we need not resolve that multi-layered conundrum here because even under de novo review we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10245 - 2005-03-31
decision, we need not resolve that multi-layered conundrum here because even under de novo review we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10245 - 2005-03-31