Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16011 - 16020 of 29821 for des.

State v. Steven J. Keizer
subject to de novo review. State v. Pettit, 171 Wis.2d 627, 639, 492 N.W.2d 633, 639 (Ct. App. 1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8226 - 2005-12-27

[PDF] WI APP 103
administrative interpretations of statutes and conclusions of law are great deference, due-weight and de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33015 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that this court reviews de novo. Id. ¶8 WISCONSIN STAT. § 343.303 provides that “[i]f a law enforcement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192020 - 2017-09-21

State v. Willie J. Hickles
that we review de novo.” Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d at 310. Once we independently confirm the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26217 - 2006-08-14

State v. Robin Jean Sanders
requirement of reasonableness also presents a question of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7480 - 2008-07-17

Ronald J. Taylor v. West American Insurance Company
de novo the trial court’s grant of summary judgment. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14780 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
qualifies as a “premises” under Wis. Stat. § 346.61 is a question of statutory construction we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79419 - 2012-03-13

[PDF] State v. Abdullah Refeeq Beyah
of whether an identification procedure denied a defendant due-process is a question of law, subject to de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10431 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Dennis L. Daggett
, of the Wisconsin Constitution—was reasonable is a question of constitutional law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4005 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. Ackerman v. Hatfield
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=630522 - 2023-03-09