Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16021 - 16030 of 30032 for consulta de causas.
Search results 16021 - 16030 of 30032 for consulta de causas.
State v. Chester Hill
was impermissibly suggestive. This is a constitutional question that we decide de novo. State v. Kaelin, 196 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9830 - 2005-03-31
was impermissibly suggestive. This is a constitutional question that we decide de novo. State v. Kaelin, 196 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9830 - 2005-03-31
Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6210 - 2005-03-31
lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6210 - 2005-03-31
State v. Marquis D. Rosenburg
review de novo without deference to the decisions of the lower courts. Eby v. Kozarek, 153 Wis. 2d 75
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17030 - 2005-03-31
review de novo without deference to the decisions of the lower courts. Eby v. Kozarek, 153 Wis. 2d 75
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17030 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to relief’” is a legal question that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89199 - 2014-09-15
demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to relief’” is a legal question that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89199 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of evidentiary or historical fact under the clearly erroneous standard. Id., ¶18. We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255163 - 2020-02-27
of evidentiary or historical fact under the clearly erroneous standard. Id., ¶18. We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255163 - 2020-02-27
[PDF]
Robert Perry v. Foremost Farms USA Cooperative
the trial court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15772 - 2017-09-21
the trial court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15772 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Spring A. Long
are questions of law that we review de novo. See Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. EXTRADITION ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15730 - 2017-09-21
are questions of law that we review de novo. See Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. EXTRADITION ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15730 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law we review de novo. Id. at 127-28. ¶7 Whether a plea was knowingly, voluntarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89384 - 2014-09-15
of law we review de novo. Id. at 127-28. ¶7 Whether a plea was knowingly, voluntarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89384 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. We review that issue de novo. Id. ¶6 The first step in the analysis is to determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=521700 - 2022-05-18
. We review that issue de novo. Id. ¶6 The first step in the analysis is to determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=521700 - 2022-05-18
[PDF]
State v. Quinton K. Washington
or prejudicial are legal issues that we review de novo. Id. We now address each of Washington’s alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10844 - 2017-09-20
or prejudicial are legal issues that we review de novo. Id. We now address each of Washington’s alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10844 - 2017-09-20