Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16021 - 16030 of 20943 for word.
Search results 16021 - 16030 of 20943 for word.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on that date. 4 ¶22 Nash’s effusion of words asserting that “WIS. STAT. § 57.06” governs this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164167 - 2017-09-21
on that date. 4 ¶22 Nash’s effusion of words asserting that “WIS. STAT. § 57.06” governs this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164167 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Nicholas A.G.
are not served in state prisons. See § 973.02. The imprecise use of the word “prison sentence” does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12589 - 2017-09-21
are not served in state prisons. See § 973.02. The imprecise use of the word “prison sentence” does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12589 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 39
be inferred from the context in which the words are placed.” ¶18 On December 19, 2006, the Wisconsin Supreme
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28186 - 2014-09-15
be inferred from the context in which the words are placed.” ¶18 On December 19, 2006, the Wisconsin Supreme
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28186 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Lake City Corporation v. City of Mequon
developed master plans. Looking directly at § 236.13(1)(c), STATS., it argues that the words “local
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8354 - 2017-09-19
developed master plans. Looking directly at § 236.13(1)(c), STATS., it argues that the words “local
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8354 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Cesare Bosco v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
determination, except that of Shelby’s interpretation of § 102.23(5)—in other words, LIRC can go back
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6255 - 2017-09-19
determination, except that of Shelby’s interpretation of § 102.23(5)—in other words, LIRC can go back
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6255 - 2017-09-19
State v. George Stone
of the word “an” means that he could not be convicted of more than one included crime.[2] He also argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14830 - 2005-03-31
of the word “an” means that he could not be convicted of more than one included crime.[2] He also argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14830 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the words selected by the legislature. Id. In addition, when multiple statutes address a topic, “we seek
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172266 - 2017-09-21
the words selected by the legislature. Id. In addition, when multiple statutes address a topic, “we seek
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172266 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Niko MaShell Triggs
garnered enough valid evidence linking him to the crime. In other words, the deception did not interject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4947 - 2017-09-19
garnered enough valid evidence linking him to the crime. In other words, the deception did not interject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4947 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and circumspection.” See id. In other words, “[i]t is substantially the equivalent of the exercise of discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83975 - 2014-09-15
, and circumspection.” See id. In other words, “[i]t is substantially the equivalent of the exercise of discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83975 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Tecwyn Roberts v. John J. Wolf
person in the position of the insured would have understood the words to mean. Kozak v. U.S. Fid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2565 - 2017-09-19
person in the position of the insured would have understood the words to mean. Kozak v. U.S. Fid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2565 - 2017-09-19