Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16041 - 16050 of 30150 for consulta de causas.

State v. John C. Clincy
and seizure satisfies constitutional demands is a question of law subject to de novo review. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12379 - 2005-03-31

Robert B. Corris v. Barton Peck
In an appeal from the entry of summary judgment, this court reviews the record de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7425 - 2005-03-31

State v. Ricardo Miramontes-Santos
facts, are sufficient to fulfill the constitutional standard is a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5108 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, has acknowledged arguments for both the discretionary standard as well as de novo review, and it has
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980324 - 2025-07-08

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
). Our review of whether the facts constitute reasonable suspicion or probable cause, however, is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=970388 - 2025-06-18

State v. Sally Ann Minniecheske
and remand to the trial court for de novo consideration of Minniescheske’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12127 - 2005-03-31

Gregory Thornton v. City of Milwaukee
is protected by qualified privilege is a question of law that we review de novo. Forman v. Richmond Police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5648 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of law that this court reviews de novo.” Id. (emphasis added). The PRB’s findings will be upheld
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=801768 - 2024-05-21

State v. Curtis E. Dittberner
for our de novo review. See State v. Stary, 187 Wis. 2d 266, 269, 522 N.W.2d 32 (Ct. App. 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3291 - 2005-03-31

State v. Ronald C. Foust
the application of constitutional standards to undisputed facts. It is thus a question of law, which we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12105 - 2005-03-31