Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16041 - 16050 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Search results 16041 - 16050 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
State v. Michael L., Jr.
a restitution order comports with the statute is, however, subject to our de novo review. State v. Canady
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5302 - 2017-09-19
a restitution order comports with the statute is, however, subject to our de novo review. State v. Canady
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5302 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Vito George Ambrosia
as applied to established facts is de novo. See State v. Turner, 136 Wis.2d 333, 344, 401 N.W.2d 827, 832
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10076 - 2017-09-19
as applied to established facts is de novo. See State v. Turner, 136 Wis.2d 333, 344, 401 N.W.2d 827, 832
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10076 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Frontsheet
findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179279 - 2017-09-21
findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179279 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Ventae Parrow
entitle the defendant to relief, is a question of law to be reviewed de novo by this court. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14987 - 2017-09-21
entitle the defendant to relief, is a question of law to be reviewed de novo by this court. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14987 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
to interpret and apply WIS. STAT. § 803.05, and we do so de novo. Christensen v. Sullivan, 2009 WI 87, ¶42
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46026 - 2014-09-15
to interpret and apply WIS. STAT. § 803.05, and we do so de novo. Christensen v. Sullivan, 2009 WI 87, ¶42
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46026 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the argument sections of Moreno’s briefs seemingly invite this court to determine de novo that Ann’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233633 - 2019-01-29
, the argument sections of Moreno’s briefs seemingly invite this court to determine de novo that Ann’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233633 - 2019-01-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
mph in excess of the speed limit is actually “de minimus or counterintuitive to evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259260 - 2020-05-05
mph in excess of the speed limit is actually “de minimus or counterintuitive to evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259260 - 2020-05-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(1997) (citations omitted). Standing presents a question of law for our de novo review. See Chenequa
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249834 - 2019-11-12
(1997) (citations omitted). Standing presents a question of law for our de novo review. See Chenequa
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249834 - 2019-11-12
[PDF]
NOTICE
review de novo. See Marotz v. Hallman, 2007 WI 89, ¶15, 302 Wis. 2d 428, 734 N.W.2d 411
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49635 - 2014-09-15
review de novo. See Marotz v. Hallman, 2007 WI 89, ¶15, 302 Wis. 2d 428, 734 N.W.2d 411
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49635 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
on the information in making its sentencing decision. Id., ¶26. On appeal, our review is de novo. Id., ¶9. ¶16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73393 - 2011-11-07
on the information in making its sentencing decision. Id., ¶26. On appeal, our review is de novo. Id., ¶9. ¶16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73393 - 2011-11-07