Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16041 - 16050 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Search results 16041 - 16050 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Russell A. Jorgensen v. Dean G. Katz
judgment; we independently apply the methodology set forth in § 802.08(2), Stats., to the record de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8826 - 2005-03-31
judgment; we independently apply the methodology set forth in § 802.08(2), Stats., to the record de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8826 - 2005-03-31
State v. David J. Baertschi
defense, are questions of law that we review de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 633-34, 369
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15607 - 2005-03-31
defense, are questions of law that we review de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 633-34, 369
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15607 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
duties is a question of law that we review de novo. See Brown, 293 Wis. 2d 594, ¶21. ¶10 The only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29782 - 2007-07-23
duties is a question of law that we review de novo. See Brown, 293 Wis. 2d 594, ¶21. ¶10 The only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29782 - 2007-07-23
COURT OF APPEALS
of constitutional fact de novo. Id. ¶12 Based on the testimony at the suppression hearing and the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132848 - 2015-01-13
of constitutional fact de novo. Id. ¶12 Based on the testimony at the suppression hearing and the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132848 - 2015-01-13
COURT OF APPEALS
conclusion subject to our de novo review. See id., ¶32-37. ¶10 Braun sought a declaratory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49115 - 2010-04-19
conclusion subject to our de novo review. See id., ¶32-37. ¶10 Braun sought a declaratory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49115 - 2010-04-19
COURT OF APPEALS
. However, for questions of statutory construction, such as this one, our review is de novo. Stuart v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88770 - 2012-10-29
. However, for questions of statutory construction, such as this one, our review is de novo. Stuart v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88770 - 2012-10-29
2008 WI APP 183
judgment de novo, and we use the same methodology as did the trial court. Cole v. Hubanks, 2004 WI 74, ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34520 - 2008-12-16
judgment de novo, and we use the same methodology as did the trial court. Cole v. Hubanks, 2004 WI 74, ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34520 - 2008-12-16
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Hoover
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33493 - 2008-07-28
of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Hoover
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33493 - 2008-07-28
Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6208 - 2005-03-31
lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6208 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
constitutes a new factor is a question of law for our de novo review. See State v. Harbor, 2011 WI 28, ¶33
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=290960 - 2020-09-29
constitutes a new factor is a question of law for our de novo review. See State v. Harbor, 2011 WI 28, ¶33
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=290960 - 2020-09-29