Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16041 - 16050 of 30191 for de.
Search results 16041 - 16050 of 30191 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of evidentiary or historical fact under the clearly erroneous standard. Id., ¶18. We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255163 - 2020-02-27
of evidentiary or historical fact under the clearly erroneous standard. Id., ¶18. We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255163 - 2020-02-27
[PDF]
State v. Mareese Anderson
609, 611 (1989). Whether a “new factor” exists is a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11809 - 2017-09-21
609, 611 (1989). Whether a “new factor” exists is a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11809 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and law. Id. We review de novo whether counsel’s performance was deficient or prejudicial. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=431613 - 2021-09-29
and law. Id. We review de novo whether counsel’s performance was deficient or prejudicial. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=431613 - 2021-09-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to which we apply de novo review.” Saunders, 255 Wis. 2d 589, ¶15 (italics added). ¶10 In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191025 - 2017-09-21
to which we apply de novo review.” Saunders, 255 Wis. 2d 589, ¶15 (italics added). ¶10 In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191025 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
dispute whether the Department acted according to law, a question that we review de novo without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=528292 - 2022-06-03
dispute whether the Department acted according to law, a question that we review de novo without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=528292 - 2022-06-03
Kevin J. Kollock v. City of Cumberland Zoning Board of Appeals
, it is ambiguous. Id. Whether an ordinance is ambiguous is a question of law we review de novo. See Boltz v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7446 - 2005-03-31
, it is ambiguous. Id. Whether an ordinance is ambiguous is a question of law we review de novo. See Boltz v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7446 - 2005-03-31
John Nanna v. The Helen B. Daly Trust
). The enforceability question was determined by summary judgment. It is sufficient to note that our review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26124 - 2006-08-03
). The enforceability question was determined by summary judgment. It is sufficient to note that our review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26124 - 2006-08-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to relief. State v. Balliette, 2011 WI 79, ¶18, 336 Wis. 2d 358, 805 N.W.2d 334. We review de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020949 - 2025-10-09
to relief. State v. Balliette, 2011 WI 79, ¶18, 336 Wis. 2d 358, 805 N.W.2d 334. We review de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020949 - 2025-10-09
[PDF]
Richard F. Salewske v. Leroy W. Depies
a question of law that we review de novo. See Wausau Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Dane County, 142 Wis. 2d 315
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16261 - 2017-09-21
a question of law that we review de novo. See Wausau Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Dane County, 142 Wis. 2d 315
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16261 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michelle S.
is a legal issue that we review de novo, State v. Thomas J.W., 213 Wis. 2d 264, 268–269, 570 N.W.2d 586
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3318 - 2017-09-19
is a legal issue that we review de novo, State v. Thomas J.W., 213 Wis. 2d 264, 268–269, 570 N.W.2d 586
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3318 - 2017-09-19