Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16041 - 16050 of 29740 for des.
Search results 16041 - 16050 of 29740 for des.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
breached the terms of the agreement is one of law that we review de novo. See Howard, 246 Wis. 2d 475
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=290699 - 2020-09-23
breached the terms of the agreement is one of law that we review de novo. See Howard, 246 Wis. 2d 475
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=290699 - 2020-09-23
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 309-10, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54126 - 2010-09-07
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 309-10, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54126 - 2010-09-07
State v. Isaac J.R.
, 434 N.W.2d 773, 778 (1989). However, despite our de novo standard of review, we benefit from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12571 - 2005-03-31
, 434 N.W.2d 773, 778 (1989). However, despite our de novo standard of review, we benefit from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12571 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
conduct constituted ineffective assistance is a question of law, which we decide de novo. Id. To prevail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75598 - 2011-12-21
conduct constituted ineffective assistance is a question of law, which we decide de novo. Id. To prevail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75598 - 2011-12-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to relief. State v. Balliette, 2011 WI 79, ¶18, 336 Wis. 2d 358, 805 N.W.2d 334. We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020949 - 2025-10-09
to relief. State v. Balliette, 2011 WI 79, ¶18, 336 Wis. 2d 358, 805 N.W.2d 334. We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020949 - 2025-10-09
State v. DeVon'tre L. Cottingham
question which we review de novo. ¶7 Cottingham first argues that trial counsel failed to argue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5189 - 2005-03-31
question which we review de novo. ¶7 Cottingham first argues that trial counsel failed to argue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5189 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
N.W.2d 857 (1979). We review grants of summary judgment de novo. Donaldson v. Urban Land Interests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108789 - 2014-03-10
N.W.2d 857 (1979). We review grants of summary judgment de novo. Donaldson v. Urban Land Interests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108789 - 2014-03-10
COURT OF APPEALS
, which is reviewed de novo. Walworth Cnty. v. Therese B., 2003 WI App 223, ¶21, 267 Wis. 2d 310, 671 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92610 - 2013-02-06
, which is reviewed de novo. Walworth Cnty. v. Therese B., 2003 WI App 223, ¶21, 267 Wis. 2d 310, 671 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92610 - 2013-02-06
COURT OF APPEALS
that person’s consent. We decide the issue of whether the convictions are multiplicitous de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32211 - 2008-03-25
that person’s consent. We decide the issue of whether the convictions are multiplicitous de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32211 - 2008-03-25
Kevin J. Kollock v. City of Cumberland Zoning Board of Appeals
, it is ambiguous. Id. Whether an ordinance is ambiguous is a question of law we review de novo. See Boltz v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7446 - 2005-03-31
, it is ambiguous. Id. Whether an ordinance is ambiguous is a question of law we review de novo. See Boltz v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7446 - 2005-03-31