Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16051 - 16060 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Search results 16051 - 16060 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
COURT OF APPEALS
, would entitle the defendant to relief. This is a question of law that [appellate courts] review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123252 - 2014-10-06
, would entitle the defendant to relief. This is a question of law that [appellate courts] review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123252 - 2014-10-06
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. Jeannie M.P., 286 Wis. 2d 721, ¶6. ¶11 Davis first claims counsel performed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74931 - 2011-12-13
de novo. Jeannie M.P., 286 Wis. 2d 721, ¶6. ¶11 Davis first claims counsel performed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74931 - 2011-12-13
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 21, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
been denied this due process right is a constitutional issue that an appellate court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28155 - 2007-02-20
been denied this due process right is a constitutional issue that an appellate court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28155 - 2007-02-20
Timothy J. Gross v. Gail M. Gross
de novo. Id. at 846‑47, 454 N.W.2d at 58. Under Wis. Adm. Code § HSS 80.02(21), a “serial family
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9009 - 2005-03-31
de novo. Id. at 846‑47, 454 N.W.2d at 58. Under Wis. Adm. Code § HSS 80.02(21), a “serial family
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9009 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. See State v. Harris, 2004 WI 64, ¶11, 272 Wis. 2d 80, 680 N.W.2d 737. We review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55960 - 2010-10-27
review de novo. See State v. Harris, 2004 WI 64, ¶11, 272 Wis. 2d 80, 680 N.W.2d 737. We review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55960 - 2010-10-27
Karen Sann v. Badger Care-A-Vans, Inc.
The issue presented is one of statutory construction, a question of law we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4371 - 2005-03-31
The issue presented is one of statutory construction, a question of law we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4371 - 2005-03-31
Bernard G. Manske v. Royal Bank
. DISCUSSION We review a trial court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13714 - 2005-03-31
. DISCUSSION We review a trial court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13714 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for their loss.” DOT appeals. We review a circuit court’s decision to grant summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=741644 - 2023-12-20
for their loss.” DOT appeals. We review a circuit court’s decision to grant summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=741644 - 2023-12-20
COURT OF APPEALS
of the $2500 necessary to convict him of a Class C felony. We review de novo whether a court had subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36249 - 2009-04-28
of the $2500 necessary to convict him of a Class C felony. We review de novo whether a court had subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36249 - 2009-04-28
COURT OF APPEALS
Droegkamp is a “prevailing” party is a question of law that we review de novo. See Shadley v. Lloyds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69856 - 2011-08-16
Droegkamp is a “prevailing” party is a question of law that we review de novo. See Shadley v. Lloyds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69856 - 2011-08-16