Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16051 - 16060 of 30077 for de.
Search results 16051 - 16060 of 30077 for de.
Ernie Garibay v. Circuit Court for Kenosha County
. § 971.20(6). An issue of statutory interpretation presents a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5135 - 2005-03-31
. § 971.20(6). An issue of statutory interpretation presents a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5135 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that we review de novo. Id. We then turn to the motion for severance, which is “addressed to the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=995346 - 2025-08-12
that we review de novo. Id. We then turn to the motion for severance, which is “addressed to the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=995346 - 2025-08-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that we review de novo. Id. We then turn to the motion for severance, which is “addressed to the trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=995346 - 2025-08-12
that we review de novo. Id. We then turn to the motion for severance, which is “addressed to the trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=995346 - 2025-08-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to those facts is reviewed de novo. See State v. Blatterman, 2015 WI 46, ¶26 n.9, 362 Wis. 2d 138, 864
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176618 - 2017-09-21
to those facts is reviewed de novo. See State v. Blatterman, 2015 WI 46, ¶26 n.9, 362 Wis. 2d 138, 864
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176618 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review is de novo, State v. Tiepelman, 2006 WI 66, ¶9, 291 Wis. 2d 179, 717 N.W.2d 1; however, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132114 - 2017-09-21
review is de novo, State v. Tiepelman, 2006 WI 66, ¶9, 291 Wis. 2d 179, 717 N.W.2d 1; however, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132114 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to support the jury’s guilty verdicts for three crimes. We review the sufficiency of the evidence de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=350844 - 2021-03-31
to support the jury’s guilty verdicts for three crimes. We review the sufficiency of the evidence de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=350844 - 2021-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
interpretation presents a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. Konneker v. Romano, 2010 WI 65
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142503 - 2017-09-21
interpretation presents a question of law, which this court reviews de novo. Konneker v. Romano, 2010 WI 65
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142503 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of facts presents a question of law that we review de novo. Menard, Inc. v. Liteway Lighting Prods
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105852 - 2017-09-21
of facts presents a question of law that we review de novo. Menard, Inc. v. Liteway Lighting Prods
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105852 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Dale Iversen
was deficient and prejudicial is a question of law this court reviews de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14229 - 2014-09-15
was deficient and prejudicial is a question of law this court reviews de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14229 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Evelyn Ferrer v. David I. Lopez
Construction of a statute, or its application to undisputed facts, is a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15406 - 2017-09-21
Construction of a statute, or its application to undisputed facts, is a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15406 - 2017-09-21