Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16051 - 16060 of 68257 for law.

Raymond B. Schaefer v. David D. Boldt
possession. Therefore, the Schaefers’ possession was hostile within the meaning of adverse possession law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4078 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. One 19__ Harley Davidson FLH Motorcycle
found that two stickers required by federal law, one called a federal certification label and one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11428 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Alwyn Pederson v. Debra Hewitt
. Construction of the policy is a question of law that we decide without deference to the trial court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16141 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Charles R. Seibel
, communicated an incorrect statement of the law or otherwise probably misled the jury. Id. at 59-60. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6857 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
because his representation that no zoning laws restricting MH’s operation of a Church’s Chicken fast
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86044 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Michael Cornwell v. David H. Schwarz
process of law because revocation was based on his failure to cooperate with his parole agent and he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21485 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
law enforcement concerns. Therefore, we affirm. ¶2 Acting on an anonymous tip of concern, police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36215 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Rebecca A. Yager v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
that decision. At the hearing on her claim, the administrative law judge (ALJ) concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14396 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of sentence credit after considering the facts and the applicable law
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109997 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
constitutional if an officer “reasonably suspects that a person is violating the non-criminal traffic laws
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44984 - 2009-12-22