Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16051 - 16060 of 73361 for we.
Search results 16051 - 16060 of 73361 for we.
COURT OF APPEALS
to make him eligible to participate in that program. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 The relevant facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100621 - 2013-08-13
to make him eligible to participate in that program. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 The relevant facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100621 - 2013-08-13
Arlene Arnold v. David Arnold
, there was no compelling reason to deny equal placement. We reject his arguments and affirm. ¶2 David acknowledges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6578 - 2005-03-31
, there was no compelling reason to deny equal placement. We reject his arguments and affirm. ¶2 David acknowledges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6578 - 2005-03-31
State v. Bernhardt C. Thompson
evidence of his status in the record. We affirm since the presentence investigation report was available
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15441 - 2005-03-31
evidence of his status in the record. We affirm since the presentence investigation report was available
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15441 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=277008 - 2020-08-12
review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=277008 - 2020-08-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1085846 - 2026-03-04
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1085846 - 2026-03-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1085846 - 2026-03-04
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1085846 - 2026-03-04
COURT OF APPEALS
of counsel; and (3) he was sentenced on the basis of inaccurate information. We disagree and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57484 - 2010-12-06
of counsel; and (3) he was sentenced on the basis of inaccurate information. We disagree and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57484 - 2010-12-06
[PDF]
NOTICE
explain how it found that Bandy could afford counsel. We reverse. ¶2 Bandy sought counsel after she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44852 - 2014-09-15
explain how it found that Bandy could afford counsel. We reverse. ¶2 Bandy sought counsel after she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44852 - 2014-09-15
Rosanne L. Johnson v. Michael E. Royalty, Jr.
to disobey the orders were justified. We disagree and affirm. Background Michael E
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13458 - 2005-03-31
to disobey the orders were justified. We disagree and affirm. Background Michael E
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13458 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. We reject Simonsen’s argument, and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Simonsen was employed as a bartender
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92780 - 2013-02-11
. We reject Simonsen’s argument, and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Simonsen was employed as a bartender
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92780 - 2013-02-11