Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16061 - 16070 of 30081 for de.
Search results 16061 - 16070 of 30081 for de.
State v. Aurelio Magdariaga
-of-counsel claims is a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Bentley, 201 Wis.2d 303, 308
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10991 - 2005-03-31
-of-counsel claims is a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Bentley, 201 Wis.2d 303, 308
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10991 - 2005-03-31
Mary A. Cruz v. All Saints Healthcare System, Inc.
of the cross-claims. ¶4 We review a trial court’s grant or denial of summary judgment de novo. Waters v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6399 - 2005-03-31
of the cross-claims. ¶4 We review a trial court’s grant or denial of summary judgment de novo. Waters v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6399 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law that this court decides de novo. Ibid. First, the defendant must show that counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95505 - 2013-04-15
a question of law that this court decides de novo. Ibid. First, the defendant must show that counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95505 - 2013-04-15
[PDF]
Village of Cross Plains v. Kristin J. Haanstad
facts. Thus, this issue presents a question of law we review de novo. State v. Carlson, 2002 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18129 - 2017-09-21
facts. Thus, this issue presents a question of law we review de novo. State v. Carlson, 2002 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18129 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
the discretion of the circuit court, whether a claim is justiciable is a legal conclusion subject to our de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49115 - 2014-09-15
the discretion of the circuit court, whether a claim is justiciable is a legal conclusion subject to our de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49115 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Teachers’ Educ. Ass’n, 93 Wis. 2d 415, 422, 287 N.W.2d 131 (1980). Consequently, our de novo appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101464 - 2017-09-21
Teachers’ Educ. Ass’n, 93 Wis. 2d 415, 422, 287 N.W.2d 131 (1980). Consequently, our de novo appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101464 - 2017-09-21
Roberta Youso v. City of Neenah Board of Review
, BILL DE GENEFFE and CLERK JEAN MOXON
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9043 - 2005-03-31
, BILL DE GENEFFE and CLERK JEAN MOXON
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9043 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of whether the facts supported probable cause, which we review de novo. See id. Discussion ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34197 - 2008-10-01
of whether the facts supported probable cause, which we review de novo. See id. Discussion ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34197 - 2008-10-01
COURT OF APPEALS
at 838. Whether the facts constitute a new factor is a question of law we review de novo. Ibid. ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82322 - 2012-05-14
at 838. Whether the facts constitute a new factor is a question of law we review de novo. Ibid. ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82322 - 2012-05-14
COURT OF APPEALS
, 671 N.W.2d 692 (“Although this court engages in summary judgment review de novo, we nonetheless may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94342 - 2013-03-26
, 671 N.W.2d 692 (“Although this court engages in summary judgment review de novo, we nonetheless may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94342 - 2013-03-26