Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16061 - 16070 of 30191 for de.
Search results 16061 - 16070 of 30191 for de.
[PDF]
Elizabeth Freer v. Michael A. Whitcomb
this court to decide the issue as a matter of law. We need not decide the matter de novo. ¶13 Implicit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20975 - 2017-09-21
this court to decide the issue as a matter of law. We need not decide the matter de novo. ¶13 Implicit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20975 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo while benefitting from the analysis of the circuit court. Garza v. American
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=273511 - 2020-07-29
review de novo while benefitting from the analysis of the circuit court. Garza v. American
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=273511 - 2020-07-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
have already concluded that any discrepancy between the two statements was de minimis. See Kennedy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81586 - 2014-09-15
have already concluded that any discrepancy between the two statements was de minimis. See Kennedy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81586 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
cause to give [the defendant] a preliminary-breath test is a legal issue that we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124310 - 2017-09-21
cause to give [the defendant] a preliminary-breath test is a legal issue that we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124310 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
consent. We decide the issue of whether the convictions are multiplicitous de novo. State v. Beasley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32211 - 2014-09-15
consent. We decide the issue of whether the convictions are multiplicitous de novo. State v. Beasley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32211 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment de novo, as we do any written instrument. See Waters v. Waters, 2007 WI App 40, ¶6, 300 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110388 - 2017-09-21
judgment de novo, as we do any written instrument. See Waters v. Waters, 2007 WI App 40, ¶6, 300 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110388 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 15
the circuit court’s application of constitutional principles to the findings of fact de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58245 - 2014-09-15
the circuit court’s application of constitutional principles to the findings of fact de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58245 - 2014-09-15
State v. Christopher Dilworth
reviews de novo based on the facts as found by the trial court. State v. Mosher, 221 Wis. 2d 203, 211
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18176 - 2005-05-16
reviews de novo based on the facts as found by the trial court. State v. Mosher, 221 Wis. 2d 203, 211
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18176 - 2005-05-16
Francesca Poulin v. Indian Community School
, is a question of law that we review de novo. See id., 221 Wis. 2d at 639, 585 N.W.2d at 591. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15211 - 2005-03-31
, is a question of law that we review de novo. See id., 221 Wis. 2d at 639, 585 N.W.2d at 591. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15211 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ricardo Miramontes-Santos
facts, are sufficient to fulfill the constitutional standard is a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5108 - 2005-03-31
facts, are sufficient to fulfill the constitutional standard is a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5108 - 2005-03-31