Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16061 - 16070 of 29740 for des.
Search results 16061 - 16070 of 29740 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
N.W.2d 857 (1979). We review grants of summary judgment de novo. Donaldson v. Urban Land Interests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108789 - 2014-03-10
N.W.2d 857 (1979). We review grants of summary judgment de novo. Donaldson v. Urban Land Interests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108789 - 2014-03-10
State v. John Tereschko
is therefore de novo. In re D.S.P., 166 Wis. 2d 464, 471, 480 N.W.2d 234 (1992). On review of summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3351 - 2005-03-31
is therefore de novo. In re D.S.P., 166 Wis. 2d 464, 471, 480 N.W.2d 234 (1992). On review of summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3351 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. Healthcare Servs. Grp., Inc. v. DOR, 2018 WI App 48, ¶10, 383 Wis. 2d 699, 916 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=932371 - 2025-03-25
review de novo. Healthcare Servs. Grp., Inc. v. DOR, 2018 WI App 48, ¶10, 383 Wis. 2d 699, 916 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=932371 - 2025-03-25
COURT OF APPEALS
as a result of the juror’s inattentiveness is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶48. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137502 - 2015-03-16
as a result of the juror’s inattentiveness is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶48. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137502 - 2015-03-16
[PDF]
NOTICE
review de novo. Id. ¶9 The requirement to disclose under WIS. STAT. § 971.23 includes not only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36117 - 2014-09-15
review de novo. Id. ¶9 The requirement to disclose under WIS. STAT. § 971.23 includes not only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36117 - 2014-09-15
Cassondra Pearson v. Joshua M. Prissel
. The court granted the motion. Prissel appeals. Discussion ¶8 We review summary judgments de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21375 - 2006-02-13
. The court granted the motion. Prissel appeals. Discussion ¶8 We review summary judgments de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21375 - 2006-02-13
Russell A. Jorgensen v. Dean G. Katz
judgment; we independently apply the methodology set forth in § 802.08(2), Stats., to the record de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8826 - 2012-06-17
judgment; we independently apply the methodology set forth in § 802.08(2), Stats., to the record de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8826 - 2012-06-17
COURT OF APPEALS
of law that we review de novo. See State v. Hale, 2005 WI 7, ¶41, 277 Wis. 2d 593, 691 N.W.2d 637
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83380 - 2012-06-06
of law that we review de novo. See State v. Hale, 2005 WI 7, ¶41, 277 Wis. 2d 593, 691 N.W.2d 637
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83380 - 2012-06-06
State v. Deshawn L. Harris
” that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Pulizzano, 155 Wis.2d 633, 648, 456 N.W.2d 325, 332 (1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11432 - 2014-10-06
” that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Pulizzano, 155 Wis.2d 633, 648, 456 N.W.2d 325, 332 (1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11432 - 2014-10-06
State v. Cheryl L. Welsch
are undisputed, only questions of law remain, which we review de novo. First Nat'l Leasing Corp. v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9268 - 2005-03-31
are undisputed, only questions of law remain, which we review de novo. First Nat'l Leasing Corp. v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9268 - 2005-03-31