Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16061 - 16070 of 29828 for des.
Search results 16061 - 16070 of 29828 for des.
State v. Randall M. Miller
cause to arrest are questions of law which we review de novo. See State v. Richardson, 156 Wis. 2d 128
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16238 - 2005-03-31
cause to arrest are questions of law which we review de novo. See State v. Richardson, 156 Wis. 2d 128
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16238 - 2005-03-31
State v. James W. Whistleman
is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Kittilstad, 231 Wis. 2d 245, 256, 603 N.W.2d 732 (1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3192 - 2014-11-18
is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Kittilstad, 231 Wis. 2d 245, 256, 603 N.W.2d 732 (1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3192 - 2014-11-18
State v. Michael A. Simmons
court directed a verdict in Simmons’ favor and accepted testimony that there was de minimus contact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5489 - 2005-03-31
court directed a verdict in Simmons’ favor and accepted testimony that there was de minimus contact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5489 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. See State v. Harris, 2004 WI 64, ¶11, 272 Wis. 2d 80, 680 N.W.2d 737. We review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55960 - 2010-10-27
review de novo. See State v. Harris, 2004 WI 64, ¶11, 272 Wis. 2d 80, 680 N.W.2d 737. We review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55960 - 2010-10-27
Bruce Mieloch v. Country Mutual Insurance Company
dispositions are reviewed de novo, applying the same methodology as used in the trial court. See Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2746 - 2005-03-31
dispositions are reviewed de novo, applying the same methodology as used in the trial court. See Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2746 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a “question of law subject to de novo review.” Id. (italics added). In Schaefer, we summarized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91546 - 2014-09-15
is a “question of law subject to de novo review.” Id. (italics added). In Schaefer, we summarized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91546 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184544 - 2017-09-21
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184544 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Xavier Lorenzo Brown
a set of facts is a “new factor” is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. at 97, 441 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9491 - 2017-09-19
a set of facts is a “new factor” is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. at 97, 441 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9491 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. Goff v. Seldera, 202 Wis. 2d 600, 616, 550 N.W.2d 144 (Ct. App. 1996). ¶8 Diane sought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168418 - 2017-09-21
de novo. Goff v. Seldera, 202 Wis. 2d 600, 616, 550 N.W.2d 144 (Ct. App. 1996). ¶8 Diane sought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168418 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
County of Dane v. Jeffrey J. Mawhinney
). Whether the established facts constitute probable cause to arrest is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3675 - 2017-09-19
). Whether the established facts constitute probable cause to arrest is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3675 - 2017-09-19