Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16061 - 16070 of 68502 for did.
Search results 16061 - 16070 of 68502 for did.
[PDF]
WI APP 15
window of the Buick. The police officers asked Smiter to step out of the Buick and he did. Detective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58245 - 2014-09-15
window of the Buick. The police officers asked Smiter to step out of the Buick and he did. Detective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58245 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. DeVon'tre L. Cottingham
relevant to the issues. We conclude that the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5189 - 2017-09-19
relevant to the issues. We conclude that the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5189 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Darryl D. Johnson
preliminary examination: Q And what did -- did you see what [Johnson] did next? NOS. 96-2697-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11442 - 2017-09-19
preliminary examination: Q And what did -- did you see what [Johnson] did next? NOS. 96-2697-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11442 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Evelyn Ferrer v. David I. Lopez
argues the circuit court erred in concluding that it did not have the authority under § 806.07(1)(h
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15406 - 2017-09-21
argues the circuit court erred in concluding that it did not have the authority under § 806.07(1)(h
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15406 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
246, 266-72, 389 N.W.2d 12 (1986), and that he did not understand the elements of the crimes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33960 - 2014-09-15
246, 266-72, 389 N.W.2d 12 (1986), and that he did not understand the elements of the crimes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33960 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Sky B. Busk
recognized him from the videotape, a point Jacqueline did not dispute, so he could not have been asking her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25036 - 2017-09-21
recognized him from the videotape, a point Jacqueline did not dispute, so he could not have been asking her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25036 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to a new trial. We conclude counsel did not violate SCR 20:1.12 and there was no conflict of interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86688 - 2014-09-15
to a new trial. We conclude counsel did not violate SCR 20:1.12 and there was no conflict of interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86688 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
happened.[4] On cross-examination, the child testified he did not remember the car trip, did not remember
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143004 - 2015-06-16
happened.[4] On cross-examination, the child testified he did not remember the car trip, did not remember
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143004 - 2015-06-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
did not call any witnesses and Treadwell did not testify. ¶5 Relevant to this appeal, during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=727904 - 2023-11-14
did not call any witnesses and Treadwell did not testify. ¶5 Relevant to this appeal, during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=727904 - 2023-11-14
[PDF]
State v. Roger Sundquist
Sundquist did so with reasonable suspicion that Sundquist might be engaging or had been engaged in illegal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18199 - 2017-09-21
Sundquist did so with reasonable suspicion that Sundquist might be engaging or had been engaged in illegal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18199 - 2017-09-21