Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16061 - 16070 of 33514 for ii.
Search results 16061 - 16070 of 33514 for ii.
COURT OF APPEALS
. McToy’s unspecified ‘probationary needs.’” II. ¶6 Normally, a sentencing challenge is moot once
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102980 - 2013-10-14
. McToy’s unspecified ‘probationary needs.’” II. ¶6 Normally, a sentencing challenge is moot once
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102980 - 2013-10-14
[PDF]
NOTICE
was not a postconviction motion.5 Attorney Grau was postconviction and appellate counsel. II. Investigation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60508 - 2014-09-15
was not a postconviction motion.5 Attorney Grau was postconviction and appellate counsel. II. Investigation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60508 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2022CF403 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II STATE OF WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050936 - 2025-12-17
. No. 2022CF403 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II STATE OF WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050936 - 2025-12-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2019CV1219 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II MATTHEW LORISS AND MARY LOU
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=996776 - 2025-08-20
. No. 2019CV1219 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II MATTHEW LORISS AND MARY LOU
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=996776 - 2025-08-20
Village of Greendale v. Stephanie M. Kramschuster
that was denied. II. Analysis. ¶4 Kramschuster first argues that she is entitled to a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3538 - 2005-03-31
that was denied. II. Analysis. ¶4 Kramschuster first argues that she is entitled to a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3538 - 2005-03-31
Lyle L. Smith v. Kenneth J. Bosveld
, Stats. No. 97-1159 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II Lyle L. Smith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12388 - 2005-03-31
, Stats. No. 97-1159 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II Lyle L. Smith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12388 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
supports the plea. II. Read-in Offenses ¶12 As part of the plea agreement, the State agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33924 - 2008-09-02
supports the plea. II. Read-in Offenses ¶12 As part of the plea agreement, the State agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33924 - 2008-09-02
State v. Shirley E.
as first saying, “Great” to which the trial court responded, “Great.” II. ¶6 We need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21378 - 2006-03-22
as first saying, “Great” to which the trial court responded, “Great.” II. ¶6 We need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21378 - 2006-03-22
State v. Albert G. Holman
and others with whom he would share his cocaine. II. ANALYSIS ¶7 Holman first argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16318 - 2005-03-31
and others with whom he would share his cocaine. II. ANALYSIS ¶7 Holman first argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16318 - 2005-03-31
State v. Lawrence P. Hoffman
. Appeal No. 01-2740-CR Cir. Ct. No. 99-CF-307 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4483 - 2005-03-31
. Appeal No. 01-2740-CR Cir. Ct. No. 99-CF-307 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4483 - 2005-03-31