Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16071 - 16080 of 30081 for de.
Search results 16071 - 16080 of 30081 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS
that person’s consent. We decide the issue of whether the convictions are multiplicitous de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32211 - 2008-03-25
that person’s consent. We decide the issue of whether the convictions are multiplicitous de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32211 - 2008-03-25
COURT OF APPEALS
was deficient or prejudicial are questions of law we determine de novo. Id. The court may deny
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35560 - 2009-02-17
was deficient or prejudicial are questions of law we determine de novo. Id. The court may deny
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35560 - 2009-02-17
COURT OF APPEALS
). Whether an officer has probable cause to administer a PBT “is a legal issue that we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135400 - 2015-02-18
). Whether an officer has probable cause to administer a PBT “is a legal issue that we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135400 - 2015-02-18
Martin A. Bruflat v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Company
a summary judgment decision de novo, applying the same standards as the circuit court. See Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15832 - 2014-11-10
a summary judgment decision de novo, applying the same standards as the circuit court. See Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15832 - 2014-11-10
Susan A. Riemer v. Universal Underwriters Insurance Company
judgment is also de novo, and we apply the same standards and methods as the trial court. Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4886 - 2005-03-31
judgment is also de novo, and we apply the same standards and methods as the trial court. Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4886 - 2005-03-31
State v. David N. Burkhart
. ¶8 If we were to decide de novo whether the foregoing facts constituted probable cause, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16264 - 2005-03-31
. ¶8 If we were to decide de novo whether the foregoing facts constituted probable cause, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16264 - 2005-03-31
Gregory Thornton v. City of Milwaukee
is protected by qualified privilege is a question of law that we review de novo. Forman v. Richmond Police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5648 - 2005-03-31
is protected by qualified privilege is a question of law that we review de novo. Forman v. Richmond Police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5648 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael E. Learmont
of proof present questions of law this court reviews de novo. See Littrup, 164 Wis.2d at 126, 473 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14673 - 2005-03-31
of proof present questions of law this court reviews de novo. See Littrup, 164 Wis.2d at 126, 473 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14673 - 2005-03-31
State v. Justin Kolp
satisfy the constitutional requirement of reasonableness is a question of law, which this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3661 - 2005-03-31
satisfy the constitutional requirement of reasonableness is a question of law, which this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3661 - 2005-03-31
2008 WI APP 103
deference, due-weight and de novo review, or no deference. Telemark Dev., Inc. v. DOR, 218 Wis. 2d 809, 817
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33015 - 2008-07-29
deference, due-weight and de novo review, or no deference. Telemark Dev., Inc. v. DOR, 218 Wis. 2d 809, 817
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33015 - 2008-07-29