Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16071 - 16080 of 29740 for des.
Search results 16071 - 16080 of 29740 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for ineffective assistance of counsel is a question of law, which [appellate courts] review de novo.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250461 - 2019-11-21
for ineffective assistance of counsel is a question of law, which [appellate courts] review de novo.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250461 - 2019-11-21
[PDF]
M&I Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. Richard W. Schlueter
of the parties.” DISCUSSION ¶9 We review a circuit court’s grant or denial of summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5104 - 2017-09-19
of the parties.” DISCUSSION ¶9 We review a circuit court’s grant or denial of summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5104 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Richard R. Ludeking
.) No. 94-1527-CR -5- court reviews de novo, without deference to the trial court's determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7914 - 2017-09-19
.) No. 94-1527-CR -5- court reviews de novo, without deference to the trial court's determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7914 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
William R. Davis v. Miron Construction Co., Inc.
is a question of law we review de novo. See Kania v. Airborne Freight Corp., 99 Wis.2d 746, 758, 300 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13157 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law we review de novo. See Kania v. Airborne Freight Corp., 99 Wis.2d 746, 758, 300 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13157 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is a question of law that we review de novo.” Aicher v. Wisconsin Patients Comp. Fund, 2000 WI 98, ¶18, 237
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=297315 - 2020-10-20
is a question of law that we review de novo.” Aicher v. Wisconsin Patients Comp. Fund, 2000 WI 98, ¶18, 237
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=297315 - 2020-10-20
[PDF]
WI APP 60
is a matter of law we review de novo. Ginder v. General Cas. Co. of Wis., 2000 WI App 197, ¶4, 238 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95775 - 2014-09-15
is a matter of law we review de novo. Ginder v. General Cas. Co. of Wis., 2000 WI App 197, ¶4, 238 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95775 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. T.J. International, Inc.
interpretation de novo. See Stockbridge School Dist. v. DPI, 202 Wis. 2d 214, 219, 550 N.W.2d 96 (1996). ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16147 - 2017-09-21
interpretation de novo. See Stockbridge School Dist. v. DPI, 202 Wis. 2d 214, 219, 550 N.W.2d 96 (1996). ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16147 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
We review summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Hardy v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59866 - 2014-09-15
We review summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Hardy v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59866 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. State v. Howell, 2007 WI 75, ¶30, 301 Wis. 2d 350, 734 N.W.2d 48. We review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245838 - 2019-09-04
. State v. Howell, 2007 WI 75, ¶30, 301 Wis. 2d 350, 734 N.W.2d 48. We review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245838 - 2019-09-04
[PDF]
State v. Dennis G. Valstad
Valstad’s appellate argument on the merits. We will do likewise. ¶9 We review probable cause under a de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6260 - 2017-09-19
Valstad’s appellate argument on the merits. We will do likewise. ¶9 We review probable cause under a de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6260 - 2017-09-19