Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16071 - 16080 of 40222 for financial disclosure statement.

[PDF] NOTICE
mitigation evidence and to object to an unduly prejudicial victim impact statement. None of his arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34510 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Eugene Heitkemper, Sr.
should be impeached because of prejudicial statements made by a juror during jury deliberations, and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8171 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
to sign a statement exculpating McGowan and to give a notarized copy of the statement to the district
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133339 - 2015-01-26

State v. John Warren
.” Beyond this statement, the trial court inquired no further into Warren’s reasons for requesting a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14149 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
own defense, he reverted to his initial statement and said he was coerced to falsely admit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175582 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, the sentencing hearing, and statements made by defense counsel, to determine whether the defendant has agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144355 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Jeffrey L. Mosley
the statements of a police detective when sentencing him; (2) that the trial court abused its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9058 - 2017-09-19

State v. Duane E. Elm
. Because we conclude the physician's statement was admissible opinion testimony and Elm was not denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7830 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, instructing her to sign a statement exculpating McGowan and to give a notarized copy of the statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133339 - 2017-09-21

State v. Eugene Heitkemper, Sr.
) the verdict should be impeached because of prejudicial statements made by a juror during jury deliberations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8171 - 2005-03-31