Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16081 - 16090 of 29823 for des.
Search results 16081 - 16090 of 29823 for des.
State v. William M. Schleck
satisfy a constitutional standard is a question of law that we review de novo. Klessig, 211 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2653 - 2005-03-31
satisfy a constitutional standard is a question of law that we review de novo. Klessig, 211 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2653 - 2005-03-31
State v. William K. Nord
Statutory construction presents a question of law this court reviews de novo. Wisconsin Fin. Corp. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2670 - 2005-03-31
Statutory construction presents a question of law this court reviews de novo. Wisconsin Fin. Corp. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2670 - 2005-03-31
State v. Marquis D. Rosenburg
review de novo without deference to the decisions of the lower courts. Eby v. Kozarek, 153 Wis. 2d 75
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17030 - 2005-03-31
review de novo without deference to the decisions of the lower courts. Eby v. Kozarek, 153 Wis. 2d 75
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17030 - 2005-03-31
State v. John A. Mahoney
review de novo. State v. Leighton, 2000 WI App 156, ¶5, 237 Wis. 2d 709, 715, 616 N.W.2d 126, 132-33
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3009 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. State v. Leighton, 2000 WI App 156, ¶5, 237 Wis. 2d 709, 715, 616 N.W.2d 126, 132-33
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3009 - 2005-03-31
State v. Richard G. Giese
this court decides de novo. See State v. Phillips, 218 Wis.2d 180, 195, 577 N.W.2d 794, 801 (1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14989 - 2005-03-31
this court decides de novo. See State v. Phillips, 218 Wis.2d 180, 195, 577 N.W.2d 794, 801 (1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14989 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of No. 2011AP2989 4 counsel is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Balliette
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100715 - 2017-09-21
of No. 2011AP2989 4 counsel is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Balliette
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100715 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that it made based on the evidence.” See State ex rel. Smits v. City of De Pere, 104 Wis. 2d 26, 31, 310 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219877 - 2018-10-02
that it made based on the evidence.” See State ex rel. Smits v. City of De Pere, 104 Wis. 2d 26, 31, 310 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219877 - 2018-10-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to which we apply de novo review.” Saunders, 255 Wis. 2d 589, ¶15 (italics added). ¶10 In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191025 - 2017-09-21
to which we apply de novo review.” Saunders, 255 Wis. 2d 589, ¶15 (italics added). ¶10 In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191025 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was deficient and prejudicial presents a question of law we review de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120636 - 2014-09-15
was deficient and prejudicial presents a question of law we review de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120636 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Dennis G. Valstad
Valstad’s appellate argument on the merits. We will do likewise. ¶9 We review probable cause under a de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6260 - 2017-09-19
Valstad’s appellate argument on the merits. We will do likewise. ¶9 We review probable cause under a de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6260 - 2017-09-19