Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16081 - 16090 of 29823 for des.
Search results 16081 - 16090 of 29823 for des.
Frontsheet
Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14, ¶5, 269 Wis. 2d 43, 675 N.W.2d 747. We review the referee's conclusions of law de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146523 - 2015-08-17
Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14, ¶5, 269 Wis. 2d 43, 675 N.W.2d 747. We review the referee's conclusions of law de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146523 - 2015-08-17
COURT OF APPEALS
is to “review the determination of reasonable suspicion de novo.” Id. ¶12 If the only erratic driving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36470 - 2009-05-12
is to “review the determination of reasonable suspicion de novo.” Id. ¶12 If the only erratic driving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36470 - 2009-05-12
William Ellingsworth v. Frederick Swiggum
. The construction of a statute when the facts are not disputed presents an issue of law, which this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7954 - 2005-03-31
. The construction of a statute when the facts are not disputed presents an issue of law, which this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7954 - 2005-03-31
2008 WI APP 183
judgment de novo, and we use the same methodology as did the trial court. Cole v. Hubanks, 2004 WI 74, ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34520 - 2008-12-16
judgment de novo, and we use the same methodology as did the trial court. Cole v. Hubanks, 2004 WI 74, ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34520 - 2008-12-16
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
will conduct a de novo review because the issues are issues of law and the facts are undisputed. See Gielow v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50541 - 2010-07-27
will conduct a de novo review because the issues are issues of law and the facts are undisputed. See Gielow v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50541 - 2010-07-27
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Sara M.
in a proceeding in circuit court is a question of law, which we review de novo. Thomas Y. v. St. Croix County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13584 - 2013-03-31
in a proceeding in circuit court is a question of law, which we review de novo. Thomas Y. v. St. Croix County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13584 - 2013-03-31
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Sara M.
in a proceeding in circuit court is a question of law, which we review de novo. Thomas Y. v. St. Croix County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13583 - 2013-03-31
in a proceeding in circuit court is a question of law, which we review de novo. Thomas Y. v. St. Croix County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13583 - 2013-03-31
Charles Schroeder v. Linda Wacker
. As such, it presents a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See Probst v. Winnebago County, 208 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2130 - 2005-03-31
. As such, it presents a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See Probst v. Winnebago County, 208 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2130 - 2005-03-31
State v. Roland A. Smart
in smaller counties were allowed to seek de novo review. Id. at ¶6. The supreme court determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4996 - 2011-07-31
in smaller counties were allowed to seek de novo review. Id. at ¶6. The supreme court determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4996 - 2011-07-31
State v. Jared J.
of a statute presents a question of law which we are to review de novo. See R.W.S. v. State, 156 Wis.2d 526
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12836 - 2005-03-31
of a statute presents a question of law which we are to review de novo. See R.W.S. v. State, 156 Wis.2d 526
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12836 - 2005-03-31