Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16091 - 16100 of 64786 for b's.
Search results 16091 - 16100 of 64786 for b's.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 28, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of Appe...
of the circuit court for Dane County: angela b. bartell, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 DYKMAN, J.[1] T-Juana
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29512 - 2007-06-27
of the circuit court for Dane County: angela b. bartell, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 DYKMAN, J.[1] T-Juana
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29512 - 2007-06-27
COURT OF APPEALS
will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76641 - 2012-01-17
will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76641 - 2012-01-17
[PDF]
Waushara County v. Clinton L. Duhm
brought pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 345.51 is that found in WIS. STAT. § 345.37(1)(b), whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4530 - 2017-09-19
brought pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 345.51 is that found in WIS. STAT. § 345.37(1)(b), whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4530 - 2017-09-19
Carla Randecker v. Frances C. Lindsey
Indemnity Co. d/b/a Connecticut Specialty Ins. Co. d/b/a Security Ins. Co. of Hartford
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2194 - 2005-03-31
Indemnity Co. d/b/a Connecticut Specialty Ins. Co. d/b/a Security Ins. Co. of Hartford
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2194 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Kiemonte Lamont King
of conviction for possession with intent to deliver cocaine, contrary to §§ 161.16(2)(b)(1) and 161.41(1m)(cm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10729 - 2017-09-20
of conviction for possession with intent to deliver cocaine, contrary to §§ 161.16(2)(b)(1) and 161.41(1m)(cm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10729 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Erica S.
motions shall … [b]e in writing.” Id. (emphasis added). We see no reason why a second written motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2884 - 2017-09-19
motions shall … [b]e in writing.” Id. (emphasis added). We see no reason why a second written motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2884 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Alan C. Olson & Associates v. Susannah Q. Carey
a fixed amount of money … if … (a) [i]t is payable … to order at the time it is issued … [and] (b) [i]t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7249 - 2017-09-20
a fixed amount of money … if … (a) [i]t is payable … to order at the time it is issued … [and] (b) [i]t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7249 - 2017-09-20
Robert Philipp v. Odyssey Re (London) Limited
court for Vilas County: james b. mohr, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded. Before Cane, C.J., Myse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14983 - 2005-03-31
court for Vilas County: james b. mohr, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded. Before Cane, C.J., Myse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14983 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 6, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
Sec. 972.11(2)(b), Wis. Stats.” The trial court concluded “I don’t see it being that significant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27996 - 2007-02-05
Sec. 972.11(2)(b), Wis. Stats.” The trial court concluded “I don’t see it being that significant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27996 - 2007-02-05
COURT OF APPEALS
for six months, pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 628.10(2)(b) (2011-12),[1] and that she pay a forfeiture of $2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108226 - 2014-02-19
for six months, pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 628.10(2)(b) (2011-12),[1] and that she pay a forfeiture of $2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108226 - 2014-02-19