Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16091 - 16100 of 30142 for consulta de causas.
Search results 16091 - 16100 of 30142 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
have been violated is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Steinhardt, 2017 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244704 - 2019-08-06
have been violated is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Steinhardt, 2017 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244704 - 2019-08-06
[PDF]
WI App 139
that we review de novo.” See id. If Brown’s motion raises such facts, then the trial court must hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89425 - 2014-09-15
that we review de novo.” See id. If Brown’s motion raises such facts, then the trial court must hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89425 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
they are clearly erroneous, but whether those facts established probable cause is a legal question reviewed de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100745 - 2017-09-21
they are clearly erroneous, but whether those facts established probable cause is a legal question reviewed de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100745 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
to the verdict satisfies the legal elements of the crime constitutes a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118464 - 2014-07-28
to the verdict satisfies the legal elements of the crime constitutes a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118464 - 2014-07-28
State v. Chris C. Lichtenberg
to a speedy trial has been violated is a constitutional question we review de novo, although we will uphold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5602 - 2005-03-31
to a speedy trial has been violated is a constitutional question we review de novo, although we will uphold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5602 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. 2d 174, ¶12. Second, we review de novo the application of those historical facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131635 - 2014-12-16
. 2d 174, ¶12. Second, we review de novo the application of those historical facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131635 - 2014-12-16
State v. David N. Burkhart
. ¶8 If we were to decide de novo whether the foregoing facts constituted probable cause, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16264 - 2005-03-31
. ¶8 If we were to decide de novo whether the foregoing facts constituted probable cause, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16264 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Fortier, 2006 WI App 11, ¶18, 289 Wis. 2d 179, 709 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143085 - 2015-06-16
a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Fortier, 2006 WI App 11, ¶18, 289 Wis. 2d 179, 709 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143085 - 2015-06-16
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Hoover
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33493 - 2008-07-28
of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Hoover
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33493 - 2008-07-28
Marty H. Coopman v. American Family Insurance Company
and application of statutes to undisputed facts—which we review de novo, owing no deference to the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12264 - 2005-03-31
and application of statutes to undisputed facts—which we review de novo, owing no deference to the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12264 - 2005-03-31