Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16091 - 16100 of 30142 for consulta de causas.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to relief. State v. Balliette, 2011 WI 79, ¶18, 336 Wis. 2d 358, 805 N.W.2d 334. We review de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020949 - 2025-10-09

Luetzow Industries v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
an issue of law that we review de novo pursuant to § 227.57(5), Stats.[4] “Nevertheless, we recognize
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7958 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
, would entitle the defendant to relief. This is a question of law that we review de novo. [State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33911 - 2008-09-02

Michael S. Zeller v. Dennis D. Stockel
the applicable legal standards, however, is a question of law for de novo review. See id. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18186 - 2005-05-17

COURT OF APPEALS
additional facts as needed below. Discussion ¶6 I review de novo the circuit court’s conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108713 - 2014-03-05

WI App 128 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP1637 Complete Title o...
or technical is a question of law that we review de novo, and the burden is on the party alleged to have served
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69688 - 2011-09-27

[PDF] CA Blank Order
/Mann hearing is de novo. See Manuel, 213 Wis. 2d at 315. Upon our independent review, we have
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=819712 - 2024-07-02

[PDF] State v. Richard R. Ludeking
.) No. 94-1527-CR -5- court reviews de novo, without deference to the trial court's determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7914 - 2017-09-19

State v. Michael W. Worden
a question of law that we review de novo. See State ex rel. Frederick v. McCaughtry, 173 Wis. 2d 222, 225
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2116 - 2005-03-31

State v. Karshra C. Armstrong
de novo. See State v. Echols, 152 Wis.2d 725, 739, 449 N.W.2d 320, 325 (Ct. App. 1989
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10023 - 2005-03-31