Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16091 - 16100 of 29838 for des.
Search results 16091 - 16100 of 29838 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. Id. If the motion alleges sufficient facts, a hearing is required. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195090 - 2017-09-21
review de novo. Id. If the motion alleges sufficient facts, a hearing is required. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195090 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of No. 2011AP2989 4 counsel is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Balliette
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100715 - 2017-09-21
of No. 2011AP2989 4 counsel is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Balliette
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100715 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Quinton K. Washington
or prejudicial are legal issues that we review de novo. Id. We now address each of Washington’s alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10844 - 2017-09-20
or prejudicial are legal issues that we review de novo. Id. We now address each of Washington’s alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10844 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
have been violated is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Steinhardt, 2017 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244703 - 2019-08-06
have been violated is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Steinhardt, 2017 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244703 - 2019-08-06
[PDF]
State v. Paul E. Magnuson
construction, and we review the trial court’s decision de novo. State v. Gavigan, 122 Wis.2d 389, 391, 362
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13904 - 2014-09-15
construction, and we review the trial court’s decision de novo. State v. Gavigan, 122 Wis.2d 389, 391, 362
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13904 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Randall M. Miller
are questions of law which we review de novo. See State v. Richardson, 156 Wis. 2d 128, 137-38, 456 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16238 - 2017-09-21
are questions of law which we review de novo. See State v. Richardson, 156 Wis. 2d 128, 137-38, 456 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16238 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of facts, but the application of the law to those facts is a question of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264673 - 2020-06-16
of facts, but the application of the law to those facts is a question of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264673 - 2020-06-16
[PDF]
State v. Eugene E. Volk
of a statute to undisputed facts, our review is de novo. See State v. Eesley, 225 Wis. 2d 248, 254, 591
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2509 - 2017-09-19
of a statute to undisputed facts, our review is de novo. See State v. Eesley, 225 Wis. 2d 248, 254, 591
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2509 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Waukesha County v. Markus Meinhardt
which we also review de novo. State v. Baudhuin, 141 Wis. 2d 642, 648-49, 416 N.W.2d 60 (1987). ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3547 - 2017-09-19
which we also review de novo. State v. Baudhuin, 141 Wis. 2d 642, 648-49, 416 N.W.2d 60 (1987). ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3547 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
review de novo. [State v.] Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d [303,] 309-10[, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996)]. If the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32889 - 2014-09-15
review de novo. [State v.] Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d [303,] 309-10[, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996)]. If the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32889 - 2014-09-15