Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16091 - 16100 of 64042 for records/1000.
Search results 16091 - 16100 of 64042 for records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 do so. Upon this court’s independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=961948 - 2025-05-28
2 do so. Upon this court’s independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=961948 - 2025-05-28
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
review of the record, we conclude there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal. We summarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=958004 - 2025-05-21
review of the record, we conclude there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal. We summarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=958004 - 2025-05-21
COURT OF APPEALS
that the transcript of the hearing held before the court commissioner could be used as part of the evidentiary record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46879 - 2010-02-08
that the transcript of the hearing held before the court commissioner could be used as part of the evidentiary record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46879 - 2010-02-08
[PDF]
State v. Rayfe J. Paulick
not to respond. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11585 - 2017-09-19
not to respond. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11585 - 2017-09-19
State v. Harlan L. Horswill
exercised its discretion based on the facts of record and according to accepted legal standards. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12072 - 2005-03-31
exercised its discretion based on the facts of record and according to accepted legal standards. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12072 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91690 - 2014-09-15
independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91690 - 2014-09-15
Ervin Merten v. Carl Holzer
, claiming that Holzer had slandered the Mertens’ title to their property by recording an “Affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11935 - 2005-03-31
, claiming that Holzer had slandered the Mertens’ title to their property by recording an “Affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11935 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
colloquy, and counsel has filed a response. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195483 - 2017-09-21
colloquy, and counsel has filed a response. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195483 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude that there are no arguably meritorious appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208691 - 2018-02-19
record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude that there are no arguably meritorious appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208691 - 2018-02-19
State v. Justin H.
would have been a residential treatment center and asserts that the record provides no valid reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9425 - 2005-03-31
would have been a residential treatment center and asserts that the record provides no valid reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9425 - 2005-03-31