Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1611 - 1620 of 50818 for WA 0812 2782 5310 Anggaran Dana Pemasangan Pintu Kaca Office Surakarta.

State v. David S. Dickelman
.[1] We conclude that when an officer observed the brake lights of a legally parked car going
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7668 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. William H. Jones
. William H. Jones claims that he reasonably refused to allow police officers to test him for blood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15086 - 2017-09-21

State v. David V. Pugh, Sr.
The arresting officer, Wisconsin State Trooper Gary Helgerson, was the only witness at the hearing on the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7538 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
OFFICE OF THE CLERK WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS 110 EAST MAIN STREET, SUITE 215 P.O
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=616598 - 2023-02-02

State v. Geoffrey Chapman
questions without triggering the protections of the Fourth Amendment.” Id. at 6. Police officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4333 - 2009-05-17

City of Waukesha v. Steven Reidy
. The issue in this appeal is whether a police officer, relying on information that a license plate’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14265 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
with possession with intent to deliver marijuana after officers entered his residence and then entered his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209550 - 2018-03-08

State v. Michael M. Meininger
. The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court correctly determined that the police officer who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10932 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] County of Dane v. Daniel P. O'Connell
2 evidence should have been granted because the arresting officer did not possess probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5869 - 2017-09-19

County of Dane v. Daniel P. O'Connell
argues that his motion to suppress evidence should have been granted because the arresting officer did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5869 - 2005-03-31