Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1611 - 1620 of 69135 for as he.
Search results 1611 - 1620 of 69135 for as he.
State v. David M. Murrell
, who testified that he was in the nightclub bathroom just prior to the shooting and heard the brief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12641 - 2005-03-31
, who testified that he was in the nightclub bathroom just prior to the shooting and heard the brief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12641 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David M. Murrell
the nightclub came from Jermaine Burrage, the brother of one of the victims, who testified that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12641 - 2017-09-21
the nightclub came from Jermaine Burrage, the brother of one of the victims, who testified that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12641 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and an order of the circuit court denying his motion for postconviction relief. On appeal, he argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=448003 - 2021-11-02
, and an order of the circuit court denying his motion for postconviction relief. On appeal, he argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=448003 - 2021-11-02
State v. Frank M. Ruszkiewicz
Ruszkiewicz raises two issues on appeal. First, he argues that the trial court failed to make an adequate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15485 - 2005-03-31
Ruszkiewicz raises two issues on appeal. First, he argues that the trial court failed to make an adequate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15485 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Frank M. Ruszkiewicz
raises two issues on appeal. First, he argues that the trial court failed to make an adequate record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15485 - 2017-09-21
raises two issues on appeal. First, he argues that the trial court failed to make an adequate record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15485 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Arden C. Hirsch
was “conduct imminently dangerous to another” or that his conduct “evinced a depraved mind.” He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3466 - 2017-09-20
was “conduct imminently dangerous to another” or that his conduct “evinced a depraved mind.” He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3466 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
testimony; (2) he suffered a violation of his sixth amendment right to confront the witnesses against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=294209 - 2020-10-06
testimony; (2) he suffered a violation of his sixth amendment right to confront the witnesses against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=294209 - 2020-10-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
his no-contest plea. Al Bawi argues that he must be permitted to withdraw his plea because his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=611949 - 2023-01-18
his no-contest plea. Al Bawi argues that he must be permitted to withdraw his plea because his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=611949 - 2023-01-18
[PDF]
NOTICE
pled no contest to and was convicted of operating a vehicle while intoxicated (2nd offense). He did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46226 - 2014-09-15
pled no contest to and was convicted of operating a vehicle while intoxicated (2nd offense). He did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46226 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion to amend his judgment of conviction to include what he describes as “his common law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71349 - 2014-09-15
postconviction motion to amend his judgment of conviction to include what he describes as “his common law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71349 - 2014-09-15

