Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1611 - 1620 of 29817 for des.
Search results 1611 - 1620 of 29817 for des.
[PDF]
State v. Carlos Santiago
is characterized as one of constitutional fact, the appellate court makes a de novo finding. 10 Addressing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16912 - 2017-09-21
is characterized as one of constitutional fact, the appellate court makes a de novo finding. 10 Addressing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16912 - 2017-09-21
Linn A. Duesterbeck v. Town of Koshkonong
This case also presents questions of statutory and constitutional interpretation, both of which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14686 - 2005-03-31
This case also presents questions of statutory and constitutional interpretation, both of which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14686 - 2005-03-31
Todd W. Brauneis v. State
of deference granted to agency decisions: great weight deference, due weight deference and de novo review
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17419 - 2005-03-31
of deference granted to agency decisions: great weight deference, due weight deference and de novo review
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17419 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Linn A. Duesterbeck v. Town of Koshkonong
of statutory and constitutional interpretation, both of which we review de novo. See Duello v. Board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14686 - 2017-09-21
of statutory and constitutional interpretation, both of which we review de novo. See Duello v. Board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14686 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 16
. Judge Des Jardins, who presided over Van Asten’s jury trial, testified he had no specific recollection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91943 - 2014-09-15
. Judge Des Jardins, who presided over Van Asten’s jury trial, testified he had no specific recollection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91943 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
) to undisputed facts. Statutory interpretation is a question of law that, as a general rule, we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51342 - 2014-09-15
) to undisputed facts. Statutory interpretation is a question of law that, as a general rule, we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51342 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
, we review de novo.[4] When reviewing an agency’s interpretation of a statute, however, we may apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51342 - 2010-06-23
, we review de novo.[4] When reviewing an agency’s interpretation of a statute, however, we may apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51342 - 2010-06-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by appellate courts. Strenke, 279 Wis. 2d 52, ¶13 (providing for a de novo standard of review under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=291031 - 2022-10-31
by appellate courts. Strenke, 279 Wis. 2d 52, ¶13 (providing for a de novo standard of review under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=291031 - 2022-10-31
State v. Peter Edge
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane County: ROBERT A. DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10608 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane County: ROBERT A. DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10608 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Motion to File Amicus-Non-Party Brief (BLOC)
ACTION Black Leaders Organizing for Communities (“BLOC”), Voces de la Frontera (“Voces”), League
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/motfileamicusnpbriefbloc.pdf - 2021-10-18
ACTION Black Leaders Organizing for Communities (“BLOC”), Voces de la Frontera (“Voces”), League
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/motfileamicusnpbriefbloc.pdf - 2021-10-18