Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1611 - 1620 of 29714 for des.
Search results 1611 - 1620 of 29714 for des.
Linn A. Duesterbeck v. Town of Koshkonong
This case also presents questions of statutory and constitutional interpretation, both of which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14686 - 2005-03-31
This case also presents questions of statutory and constitutional interpretation, both of which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14686 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 16
. Judge Des Jardins, who presided over Van Asten’s jury trial, testified he had no specific recollection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91943 - 2014-09-15
. Judge Des Jardins, who presided over Van Asten’s jury trial, testified he had no specific recollection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91943 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Todd W. Brauneis v. State
deference, due weight deference and de novo review." UFE, Inc. v. LIRC, 201 Wis. 2d 274, 284, 548 N.W.2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17419 - 2017-09-21
deference, due weight deference and de novo review." UFE, Inc. v. LIRC, 201 Wis. 2d 274, 284, 548 N.W.2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17419 - 2017-09-21
Todd W. Brauneis v. State
of deference granted to agency decisions: great weight deference, due weight deference and de novo review
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17419 - 2005-03-31
of deference granted to agency decisions: great weight deference, due weight deference and de novo review
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17419 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by appellate courts. Strenke, 279 Wis. 2d 52, ¶13 (providing for a de novo standard of review under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=291031 - 2022-10-31
by appellate courts. Strenke, 279 Wis. 2d 52, ¶13 (providing for a de novo standard of review under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=291031 - 2022-10-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, we review de novo.[4] When reviewing an agency’s interpretation of a statute, however, we may apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51342 - 2010-06-23
, we review de novo.[4] When reviewing an agency’s interpretation of a statute, however, we may apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51342 - 2010-06-23
[PDF]
NOTICE
) to undisputed facts. Statutory interpretation is a question of law that, as a general rule, we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51342 - 2014-09-15
) to undisputed facts. Statutory interpretation is a question of law that, as a general rule, we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51342 - 2014-09-15
Douglas Katerinos v. Chase Bankcard Services, Inc.
We review de novo the trial court’s decision to dismiss for failure to state a claim. See Heinritz v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6677 - 2005-03-31
We review de novo the trial court’s decision to dismiss for failure to state a claim. See Heinritz v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6677 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Chad A. Dunbarger
that we decide de novo. State v. Penzkofer, 184 Wis. 2d 262, 264, 516 N.W.2d 774 (Ct. App. 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7615 - 2017-09-19
that we decide de novo. State v. Penzkofer, 184 Wis. 2d 262, 264, 516 N.W.2d 774 (Ct. App. 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7615 - 2017-09-19
Brown County Department of Health & Human Services v. Marion L. M.
. Whether Marion was denied substantive due process is an issue of law this court reviews de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4302 - 2005-03-31
. Whether Marion was denied substantive due process is an issue of law this court reviews de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4302 - 2005-03-31