Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1611 - 1620 of 3806 for dollar.
Search results 1611 - 1620 of 3806 for dollar.
Rule Order
10.04 (4)(b) shall pay a nonrefundable fee of fifty dollars ($50) to the Office of Lawyer Regulation
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33576 - 2008-08-10
10.04 (4)(b) shall pay a nonrefundable fee of fifty dollars ($50) to the Office of Lawyer Regulation
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33576 - 2008-08-10
[PDF]
State v. James D. Crochiere
cents per hour for his work, when he could return to his former job where he would earn ten dollars
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16647 - 2017-09-21
cents per hour for his work, when he could return to his former job where he would earn ten dollars
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16647 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“a couple of hundred dollars” per year treating the loss of his eye, and he has to replace the lens of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98830 - 2014-09-15
“a couple of hundred dollars” per year treating the loss of his eye, and he has to replace the lens of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98830 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Rosemary E. Heintz v. Leonard Heintz
- and fifty-thousand-dollar range,” within the next ten years. The court stated that since Rosemary’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14997 - 2017-09-21
- and fifty-thousand-dollar range,” within the next ten years. The court stated that since Rosemary’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14997 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Mary F. Champine v. Milwaukee County
to retirement. 7 The dollar cost of this benefit can be reasonably estimated. That dollar amount is equal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7531 - 2017-09-19
to retirement. 7 The dollar cost of this benefit can be reasonably estimated. That dollar amount is equal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7531 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by the plaintiffs on May 7, 2022, represented several hundred dollars less than what the plaintiffs claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=630517 - 2023-03-09
by the plaintiffs on May 7, 2022, represented several hundred dollars less than what the plaintiffs claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=630517 - 2023-03-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
ordinances, the circuit court sustained the City’s objection to a question about the specific dollar amount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=808040 - 2024-05-31
ordinances, the circuit court sustained the City’s objection to a question about the specific dollar amount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=808040 - 2024-05-31
COURT OF APPEALS
at the Dollar Saver Store in Pleasant Prairie with “what looked like a homemade[-]type shotgun,” demanded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96841 - 2013-05-15
at the Dollar Saver Store in Pleasant Prairie with “what looked like a homemade[-]type shotgun,” demanded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96841 - 2013-05-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
be subject to a late fee of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00)” and that “[i]f more than two (2) payments per
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257974 - 2020-04-16
be subject to a late fee of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00)” and that “[i]f more than two (2) payments per
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257974 - 2020-04-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
at the Dollar Saver Store in Pleasant Prairie with “what looked like a homemade[-]type shotgun,” demanded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96841 - 2014-09-15
at the Dollar Saver Store in Pleasant Prairie with “what looked like a homemade[-]type shotgun,” demanded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96841 - 2014-09-15