Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1611 - 1620 of 12966 for se.
Search results 1611 - 1620 of 12966 for se.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). 5 In May 2020, Schneider filed a pro se motion seeking sentence credit in this case for in-custody
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=277008 - 2020-08-12
). 5 In May 2020, Schneider filed a pro se motion seeking sentence credit in this case for in-custody
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=277008 - 2020-08-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
., Mangerson and Stark, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. James Couch, pro se, appeals a default judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105773 - 2017-09-21
., Mangerson and Stark, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. James Couch, pro se, appeals a default judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105773 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
CURIAM. Sarah D. Burrell, pro se, appeals from an order denying her sentence modification motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64465 - 2011-05-23
CURIAM. Sarah D. Burrell, pro se, appeals from an order denying her sentence modification motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64465 - 2011-05-23
COURT OF APPEALS
James Anderson, pro se, appeals the order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 motion.[1] We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125348 - 2014-10-27
James Anderson, pro se, appeals the order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 motion.[1] We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125348 - 2014-10-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
purposes specified in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). Darryl Tucker, pro se, appeals from a circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214317 - 2018-06-13
purposes specified in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). Darryl Tucker, pro se, appeals from a circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214317 - 2018-06-13
COURT OF APPEALS
not to respond. We affirmed his convictions. One-and-one-half years later, Sheriff filed a pro se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85107 - 2012-07-24
not to respond. We affirmed his convictions. One-and-one-half years later, Sheriff filed a pro se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85107 - 2012-07-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-half years later, Sheriff filed a pro se postconviction motion, alleging that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85107 - 2014-09-15
-half years later, Sheriff filed a pro se postconviction motion, alleging that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85107 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, pro se, appeals from an order denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2021-22)1 postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=824937 - 2024-07-17
, pro se, appeals from an order denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2021-22)1 postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=824937 - 2024-07-17
State v. James M. Smith
." On October 9, 1992, Smith filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus to bring his case before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8273 - 2005-03-31
." On October 9, 1992, Smith filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus to bring his case before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8273 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. [2] I recognize that Trusty is proceeding pro se, but “[pro se litigants] are bound by the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42481 - 2009-10-21
. [2] I recognize that Trusty is proceeding pro se, but “[pro se litigants] are bound by the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42481 - 2009-10-21