Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1611 - 1620 of 76655 for see.

CA Blank Order
the circuit court properly exercised its sentencing discretion. See State v. Gallion, 2004 WI 42, ¶17, 270
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111898 - 2014-05-04

Selgren Development Corporation v. Wisconsin Department of Transportation
with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See § 808.10 and rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11720 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See Wis. Stat. § 808.10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56785 - 2010-11-15

COURT OF APPEALS
to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See Wis. Stat. § 808.10 and Rule 809.62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41868 - 2009-10-05

Town of Sugar Creek v. City of Elkhorn
with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See § 808.10 and Rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14439 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Michael S. Kazanjian
file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15484 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
summarily affirm. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. On May 6, 2015, the State filed a criminal complaint
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218828 - 2018-09-06

[PDF] State v. Jeffry D. Paterson
of Appeals. See § 808.10 and RULE 809.62, STATS. No. 97-2066-CR STATE OF WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12755 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Michael S. Kazanjian
file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15483 - 2017-09-21

State v. Jeffry D. Paterson
of Appeals. See § 808.10 and Rule 809.62, Stats. No. 97-2066-CR STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12755 - 2005-03-31