Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16101 - 16110 of 30032 for consulta de causas.
Search results 16101 - 16110 of 30032 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as No. 2013AP2768-CR 3 a result of the juror’s inattentiveness is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137502 - 2017-09-21
as No. 2013AP2768-CR 3 a result of the juror’s inattentiveness is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137502 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is reviewed de novo.” Id. (citations omitted). Under the first prong of the test, we review whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195105 - 2017-09-21
is reviewed de novo.” Id. (citations omitted). Under the first prong of the test, we review whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195105 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Timothy J. Lipke v. Tri-County Area School Board
). This is a question that we decide de novo, without deference to the trial court’s determination. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12318 - 2017-09-21
). This is a question that we decide de novo, without deference to the trial court’s determination. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12318 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Chet Woodward
N.W.2d 440, 448 (1996). We thus conduct a de novo review of whether the no contest plea satisfies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12378 - 2017-09-21
N.W.2d 440, 448 (1996). We thus conduct a de novo review of whether the no contest plea satisfies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12378 - 2017-09-21
State v. Michael E. Learmont
of proof present questions of law this court reviews de novo. See Littrup, 164 Wis.2d at 126, 473 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14673 - 2005-03-31
of proof present questions of law this court reviews de novo. See Littrup, 164 Wis.2d at 126, 473 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14673 - 2005-03-31
Welding Shop, Ltd. v. Silent Stalker, Inc.
review summary judgment decisions de novo, using the methodology set out in § 802.08(2), Stats. See M&I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14675 - 2005-03-31
review summary judgment decisions de novo, using the methodology set out in § 802.08(2), Stats. See M&I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14675 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Curtis E. Dittberner
of statutory interpretation. This is a question of law for our de novo review. See State v. Stary, 187 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3291 - 2017-09-19
of statutory interpretation. This is a question of law for our de novo review. See State v. Stary, 187 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3291 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Luetzow Industries v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
of § 77.54(6)(b), STATS., raises an issue of law that we review de novo pursuant to § 227.57(5), STATS.4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7958 - 2017-09-19
of § 77.54(6)(b), STATS., raises an issue of law that we review de novo pursuant to § 227.57(5), STATS.4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7958 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 91
review both questions de novo. See State v. Stenklyft, 2005 WI 71, ¶7, 281 Wis. 2d 484, 697 N.W.2d 769
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36492 - 2014-09-15
review both questions de novo. See State v. Stenklyft, 2005 WI 71, ¶7, 281 Wis. 2d 484, 697 N.W.2d 769
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36492 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
assessment. Accordingly, we review Mahnke’s testimony to determine de novo whether the totality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102003 - 2017-09-21
assessment. Accordingly, we review Mahnke’s testimony to determine de novo whether the totality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102003 - 2017-09-21