Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16101 - 16110 of 30191 for de.
Search results 16101 - 16110 of 30191 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
reviewed de novo. State v. Lechner, 217 Wis. 2d 392, 424, 576 N.W.2d 912 (1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77975 - 2014-09-15
reviewed de novo. State v. Lechner, 217 Wis. 2d 392, 424, 576 N.W.2d 912 (1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77975 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
presents a question of law that we review de novo. See Bell v. Neugart, 2002 WI App 180, ¶15, 256 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258809 - 2020-04-28
presents a question of law that we review de novo. See Bell v. Neugart, 2002 WI App 180, ¶15, 256 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258809 - 2020-04-28
[PDF]
Luetzow Industries v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
of § 77.54(6)(b), STATS., raises an issue of law that we review de novo pursuant to § 227.57(5), STATS.4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7958 - 2017-09-19
of § 77.54(6)(b), STATS., raises an issue of law that we review de novo pursuant to § 227.57(5), STATS.4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7958 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. John C. Clincy
demands is a question of law subject to de novo review. See id. “‘[W]hen a policeman has made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12379 - 2017-09-21
demands is a question of law subject to de novo review. See id. “‘[W]hen a policeman has made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12379 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Ricardo Miramontes-Santos
review de novo. See State v. Guzman, 166 Wis. 2d 577, 586, 480 N.W.2d 446 (1992); see also State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5108 - 2017-09-19
review de novo. See State v. Guzman, 166 Wis. 2d 577, 586, 480 N.W.2d 446 (1992); see also State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5108 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Sally Ann Minniecheske
to the trial court for de novo consideration of Minniescheske’s motion. By the Court.—Judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12127 - 2017-09-21
to the trial court for de novo consideration of Minniescheske’s motion. By the Court.—Judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12127 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). The application of a statute to a particular set of facts is a question of law that we review de novo. Armour v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=679391 - 2023-07-18
). The application of a statute to a particular set of facts is a question of law that we review de novo. Armour v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=679391 - 2023-07-18
COURT OF APPEALS
1, 8, 434 N.W.2d 609 (1989). First, we review de novo the legal question of whether the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104656 - 2013-11-20
1, 8, 434 N.W.2d 609 (1989). First, we review de novo the legal question of whether the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104656 - 2013-11-20
WI App 139 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case Nos.: 2012AP236-CR 2012AP237-CR ...
that we review de novo.” See id. If Brown’s motion raises such facts, then the trial court must hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89425 - 2012-12-18
that we review de novo.” See id. If Brown’s motion raises such facts, then the trial court must hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89425 - 2012-12-18
William Ellingsworth v. Frederick Swiggum
. The construction of a statute when the facts are not disputed presents an issue of law, which this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7954 - 2005-03-31
. The construction of a statute when the facts are not disputed presents an issue of law, which this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7954 - 2005-03-31