Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16101 - 16110 of 30077 for de.
Search results 16101 - 16110 of 30077 for de.
[PDF]
State v. Carson Darnell Combs
. The question before us is thus largely one of statutory interpretation, which we decide de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18890 - 2017-09-21
. The question before us is thus largely one of statutory interpretation, which we decide de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18890 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
the sufficiency of a postconviction motion de novo, based on the four corners of the motion. Id., ¶¶9, 27
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48600 - 2014-09-15
the sufficiency of a postconviction motion de novo, based on the four corners of the motion. Id., ¶¶9, 27
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48600 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
they are clearly erroneous, and we review de novo the application of those facts to the constitutional standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44738 - 2014-09-15
they are clearly erroneous, and we review de novo the application of those facts to the constitutional standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44738 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Lawrence Williams
to criminal proceedings by § 972.11(1), STATS.). We review de novo, however, the trial court's findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12432 - 2017-09-21
to criminal proceedings by § 972.11(1), STATS.). We review de novo, however, the trial court's findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12432 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Timothy J. Gross v. Gail M. Gross
(Ct. App. 1990). It is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. at 846-47, 454 N.W.2d at 58
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9009 - 2017-09-19
(Ct. App. 1990). It is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. at 846-47, 454 N.W.2d at 58
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9009 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Waukesha County v. Markus Meinhardt
which we also review de novo. State v. Baudhuin, 141 Wis. 2d 642, 648-49, 416 N.W.2d 60 (1987). ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3547 - 2017-09-19
which we also review de novo. State v. Baudhuin, 141 Wis. 2d 642, 648-49, 416 N.W.2d 60 (1987). ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3547 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
the application of constitutional principles to the factual findings de novo. See Casarez, 314 Wis. 2d 661, ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39222 - 2014-09-15
the application of constitutional principles to the factual findings de novo. See Casarez, 314 Wis. 2d 661, ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39222 - 2014-09-15
State v. James J. Mischler
. The application of a statute to undisputed facts is a question of law which we review de novo. See Gonzalez v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12701 - 2005-03-31
. The application of a statute to undisputed facts is a question of law which we review de novo. See Gonzalez v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12701 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a “prevailing” party is a question of law that we review de novo. See Shadley v. Lloyds of London, 2009 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69856 - 2014-09-15
is a “prevailing” party is a question of law that we review de novo. See Shadley v. Lloyds of London, 2009 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69856 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that this court reviews de novo. Id. ¶8 WISCONSIN STAT. § 343.303 provides that “[i]f a law enforcement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192020 - 2017-09-21
that this court reviews de novo. Id. ¶8 WISCONSIN STAT. § 343.303 provides that “[i]f a law enforcement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192020 - 2017-09-21