Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16101 - 16110 of 29740 for des.
Search results 16101 - 16110 of 29740 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the argument sections of Moreno’s briefs seemingly invite this court to determine de novo that Ann’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233633 - 2019-01-29
, the argument sections of Moreno’s briefs seemingly invite this court to determine de novo that Ann’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233633 - 2019-01-29
[PDF]
State v. Paul E. Magnuson
construction, and we review the trial court’s decision de novo. State v. Gavigan, 122 Wis.2d 389, 391, 362
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13904 - 2014-09-15
construction, and we review the trial court’s decision de novo. State v. Gavigan, 122 Wis.2d 389, 391, 362
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13904 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Robert R. Orlebeke
is a constitutional question of law which we review de novo. Id., ¶21. “A defendant who asks for resentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6697 - 2017-09-20
is a constitutional question of law which we review de novo. Id., ¶21. “A defendant who asks for resentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6697 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo. State v. Reitter, 227 Wis. 2d 213, 223, 595 N.W.2d 646 (1999). We review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209899 - 2018-03-15
that we review de novo. State v. Reitter, 227 Wis. 2d 213, 223, 595 N.W.2d 646 (1999). We review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209899 - 2018-03-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
they are clearly erroneous, and we review de novo the application of those facts to the constitutional standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44738 - 2014-09-15
they are clearly erroneous, and we review de novo the application of those facts to the constitutional standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44738 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
they are clearly erroneous, but whether those facts established probable cause is a legal question reviewed de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100745 - 2017-09-21
they are clearly erroneous, but whether those facts established probable cause is a legal question reviewed de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100745 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of whether the facts fulfill the probable cause standard. Id. This court reviews that question de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134547 - 2017-09-21
of whether the facts fulfill the probable cause standard. Id. This court reviews that question de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134547 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Village of Thiensville v. Jon R. Olsen
229, 233, 519 N.W.2d 750, 752 (Ct. App. 1994). We review statutory construction issues de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14276 - 2014-09-15
229, 233, 519 N.W.2d 750, 752 (Ct. App. 1994). We review statutory construction issues de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14276 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
David J. Gehl v. Peter Conrad
of that discretion involves a question of law, we review the question de novo, benefiting from the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26120 - 2017-09-21
of that discretion involves a question of law, we review the question de novo, benefiting from the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26120 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Justin Kolp
reviews de novo. See State v. Young, 212 Wis. 2d 417, 424, 569 N.W.2d 84 (Ct. App. 1997). Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3661 - 2017-09-19
reviews de novo. See State v. Young, 212 Wis. 2d 417, 424, 569 N.W.2d 84 (Ct. App. 1997). Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3661 - 2017-09-19