Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16111 - 16120 of 73361 for we.
Search results 16111 - 16120 of 73361 for we.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not guilty to not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect (NGI). We conclude that Navarro forfeited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682853 - 2023-07-25
not guilty to not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect (NGI). We conclude that Navarro forfeited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=682853 - 2023-07-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with her children and an increase in maintenance. We affirm the order. ¶2 Claudine and Michael J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201519 - 2017-11-15
with her children and an increase in maintenance. We affirm the order. ¶2 Claudine and Michael J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201519 - 2017-11-15
State v. Russell Stokes
. We conclude that the trial court's factual findings support its conclusion that trial counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9219 - 2005-03-31
. We conclude that the trial court's factual findings support its conclusion that trial counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9219 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
as a sixth offense. He claims that the circuit court erroneously denied his motion to suppress evidence. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75462 - 2011-12-19
as a sixth offense. He claims that the circuit court erroneously denied his motion to suppress evidence. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75462 - 2011-12-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. STAT. RULE 809.32(1)(e). Regardless, we accept McHenry’s response to the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190918 - 2017-09-21
. STAT. RULE 809.32(1)(e). Regardless, we accept McHenry’s response to the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190918 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Bernhardt C. Thompson
in the record. We affirm since the presentence investigation report was available to the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15441 - 2017-09-21
in the record. We affirm since the presentence investigation report was available to the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15441 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Town of Hallie v. City of Eau Claire
; and (2) the ordinances’ creation of a town island. We reject the Town’s arguments and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2984 - 2017-09-19
; and (2) the ordinances’ creation of a town island. We reject the Town’s arguments and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2984 - 2017-09-19
State v. Antonio Jackson
was not prejudiced by the prosecutor’s misconduct, we affirm. ¶2 Jackson was charged with first-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18286 - 2005-05-31
was not prejudiced by the prosecutor’s misconduct, we affirm. ¶2 Jackson was charged with first-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18286 - 2005-05-31
State v. Michael G. Costigan
of a breathalyzer test, should have been suppressed by the trial court. We affirm the judgment of conviction. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8904 - 2005-03-31
of a breathalyzer test, should have been suppressed by the trial court. We affirm the judgment of conviction. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8904 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Stanley D. Sallay
relief. We reject Sallay’s arguments that: (1) trial counsel was ineffective; (2) Sallay should have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13070 - 2017-09-21
relief. We reject Sallay’s arguments that: (1) trial counsel was ineffective; (2) Sallay should have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13070 - 2017-09-21