Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16121 - 16130 of 30137 for consulta de causas.
Search results 16121 - 16130 of 30137 for consulta de causas.
COURT OF APPEALS
informs the jury of the applicable law is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Ferguson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60426 - 2011-03-01
informs the jury of the applicable law is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Ferguson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60426 - 2011-03-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
counsel’s assistance was ineffective is a question of law, which we review de novo.” Id. (citation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106016 - 2017-09-21
counsel’s assistance was ineffective is a question of law, which we review de novo.” Id. (citation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106016 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
decisions de novo, applying the same methodology and legal standard employed by the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48500 - 2010-03-31
decisions de novo, applying the same methodology and legal standard employed by the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48500 - 2010-03-31
State v. Louis M. Elizondo, Jr.
is a question of constitutional fact which we review de novo, since the trial court “has no discretion” to deny
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12623 - 2005-03-31
is a question of constitutional fact which we review de novo, since the trial court “has no discretion” to deny
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12623 - 2005-03-31
Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6214 - 2005-03-31
lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6214 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. William K. Nord
. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶5 Statutory construction presents a question of law this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2670 - 2017-09-19
. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶5 Statutory construction presents a question of law this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2670 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Dale Iversen
was deficient and prejudicial is a question of law this court reviews de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14229 - 2014-09-15
was deficient and prejudicial is a question of law this court reviews de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14229 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Justin Pichler v. United States Fire Insurance Company
§ 893.80(4), STATS. II. Our review of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14002 - 2014-09-15
§ 893.80(4), STATS. II. Our review of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14002 - 2014-09-15
State v. John F. Draves
prejudiced the defense are questions of law which we review de novo. See id. at 25, 496 N.W.2d at 104-05
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10859 - 2005-03-31
prejudiced the defense are questions of law which we review de novo. See id. at 25, 496 N.W.2d at 104-05
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10859 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
was sua sponte demonstrates no error. ¶11 The grant of summary judgment itself we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97918 - 2013-06-11
was sua sponte demonstrates no error. ¶11 The grant of summary judgment itself we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97918 - 2013-06-11