Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16121 - 16130 of 30032 for consulta de causas.

COURT OF APPEALS
and dismissed Bach’s lawsuit. Bach appeals that ruling. ¶6 We review summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75493 - 2011-12-20

COURT OF APPEALS
was deficient or prejudicial are questions of law we determine de novo. Id. The court may deny
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35560 - 2009-02-17

[PDF] Gregg E. Waterman v. Theresa Roetter
statutory and court order interpretation, both of which are questions of law reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14155 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Mary A. Klovers v. City of Beaver Dam
of a significant difference between certiorari review and a claim that is litigated de novo in circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3640 - 2017-09-19

Ann M. Zutz v. Gregory S. Zutz
their relationship de novo, including the presumption that DHSS guidelines should be used to calculate child support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10714 - 2005-03-31

State v. John F. Draves
prejudiced the defense are questions of law which we review de novo. See id. at 25, 496 N.W.2d at 104-05
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10859 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Thyra K. v. Community Care Organization of Milwaukee County, Inc.
at 671–672. Whether attorney's fees are recoverable, is a question of law that is subject to our de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11691 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] NOTICE
from Schmidt’s Auto. ¶4 At the trial de novo to the court in February 2009, Mitra testified. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45732 - 2014-09-15

CA Blank Order
. Jiles, 2003 WI 66, ¶26, 262 Wis. 2d 457, 663 N.W.2d 798. We review both determinations de novo because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140210 - 2015-04-16

State v. Jared J.
of a statute presents a question of law which we are to review de novo. See R.W.S. v. State, 156 Wis.2d 526
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12837 - 2005-03-31