Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16121 - 16130 of 29823 for des.
Search results 16121 - 16130 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review de novo.” Salinas, 369 Wis. 2d 9, ¶30. We owe no deference to the trial court’s decision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=640214 - 2023-04-04
review de novo.” Salinas, 369 Wis. 2d 9, ¶30. We owe no deference to the trial court’s decision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=640214 - 2023-04-04
[PDF]
State v. Paul E. Magnuson
construction, and we review the trial court’s decision de novo. State v. Gavigan, 122 Wis.2d 389, 391, 362
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13904 - 2014-09-15
construction, and we review the trial court’s decision de novo. State v. Gavigan, 122 Wis.2d 389, 391, 362
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13904 - 2014-09-15
State v. Kerry A. Jordan
passes statutory and constitutional standards, however, is a question of law which this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16136 - 2005-03-31
passes statutory and constitutional standards, however, is a question of law which this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16136 - 2005-03-31
State v. Donna J. Prill
de novo. See State v. Spaeth, 206 Wis. 2d 135, 148, 556 N.W.2d 728, 733-34 (1996). Proof of Prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4004 - 2005-03-31
de novo. See State v. Spaeth, 206 Wis. 2d 135, 148, 556 N.W.2d 728, 733-34 (1996). Proof of Prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4004 - 2005-03-31
10AP1092 State v. John J. Neff
of constitutional standards to undisputed facts, a question of law which we review de novo. State v. VanLaarhoven
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56318 - 2010-11-09
of constitutional standards to undisputed facts, a question of law which we review de novo. State v. VanLaarhoven
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56318 - 2010-11-09
State v. Dale Iversen
was deficient and prejudicial is a question of law this court reviews de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d 121
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14540 - 2005-03-31
was deficient and prejudicial is a question of law this court reviews de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d 121
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14540 - 2005-03-31
State v. Trevor A. McKee
hearing procedures were defective is a matter of law which we review de novo, owing no deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11975 - 2005-03-31
hearing procedures were defective is a matter of law which we review de novo, owing no deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11975 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
properly granted summary judgment based on the record before it. We review de novo the grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103817 - 2017-09-21
properly granted summary judgment based on the record before it. We review de novo the grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103817 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court properly granted summary judgment is a question of law subject to de novo review. Hocking v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101555 - 2017-09-21
court properly granted summary judgment is a question of law subject to de novo review. Hocking v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101555 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the evidence de novo, but in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction. State v. Hanson, 2012 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162500 - 2017-09-21
of the evidence de novo, but in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction. State v. Hanson, 2012 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162500 - 2017-09-21