Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16121 - 16130 of 17463 for ex.

[PDF] Tammy Kolupar v. Wilde Pontiac Cadillac, Inc.
A “motion” has been defined as an “application for an order.” State ex rel. Webster Mfg. Co. v. Reid, 177
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5480 - 2017-09-19

2010 WI APP 64
is important. State ex rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane County, 2004 WI 58, ¶46, 271 Wis. 2d 633, 681 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48970 - 2011-02-07

Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
is important and . . . subsection (h) should be used sparingly." State ex rel. M.L.B. v. D.G.H., 122 Wis. 2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16750 - 2005-03-31

James M. Kernz v. J. L. French Corporation
in service will undermine public confidence in the municipal service,’” quoting State ex rel. Gudlin v. Civil
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5256 - 2005-03-31

WI App 19 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2014AP1487 Complete Title of...
absurd results. State ex rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane Cnty., 2004 WI 58, ¶46, 271 Wis. 2d 633
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133315 - 2015-02-24

2009 WI APP 143
; and reasonably, to avoid absurd or unreasonable results.” State ex rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court, 2004 WI 58, ¶46
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40095 - 2009-10-27

[PDF] WI APP 107
result. ¶10 When interpreting a statute, we begin with the statutory language. State ex rel. Kalal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86802 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
). Statutory interpretation begins with the language of the statute. State ex rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172785 - 2017-09-21

2010 WI APP 133
the entitlement to such funding were in the context of pre-trial requests, see, e.g., State ex rel. Dressler v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53662 - 2011-08-21

[PDF] State v. Delano J. O'Brien
is a mixed question of law and fact. State ex rel. Flores v. State, 183 Wis. 2d 587, 609, 516 N.W.2d 362
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17173 - 2017-09-21