Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16131 - 16140 of 30137 for consulta de causas.
Search results 16131 - 16140 of 30137 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Assessing harmless error presents a question of law we review de novo. State v. Ziebart, 2003 WI App 258
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95725 - 2014-09-15
. Assessing harmless error presents a question of law we review de novo. State v. Ziebart, 2003 WI App 258
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95725 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). The application of a statute to a particular set of facts is a question of law that we review de novo. Armour v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=679391 - 2023-07-18
). The application of a statute to a particular set of facts is a question of law that we review de novo. Armour v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=679391 - 2023-07-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to those facts is reviewed de novo. See State v. Blatterman, 2015 WI 46, ¶26 n.9, 362 Wis. 2d 138, 864
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176618 - 2017-09-21
to those facts is reviewed de novo. See State v. Blatterman, 2015 WI 46, ¶26 n.9, 362 Wis. 2d 138, 864
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176618 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is subject to de novo review. State v. Rash, 2003 WI App 32, ¶5, 260 Wis. 2d 369, 659 N.W.2d 189
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211054 - 2018-04-12
is subject to de novo review. State v. Rash, 2003 WI App 32, ¶5, 260 Wis. 2d 369, 659 N.W.2d 189
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211054 - 2018-04-12
[PDF]
State v. Michael A. Simmons
’ favor and accepted testimony that there was de minimus contact and that the contact was accidental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5489 - 2017-09-19
’ favor and accepted testimony that there was de minimus contact and that the contact was accidental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5489 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
facts constitute probable cause de novo. State v. Felton, 2012 WI App 114, ¶8, 344 Wis. 2d 483, 824
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211339 - 2018-04-18
facts constitute probable cause de novo. State v. Felton, 2012 WI App 114, ¶8, 344 Wis. 2d 483, 824
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211339 - 2018-04-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is the same under both lines of cases: de novo. See State v. Howell, 2007 WI 75, ¶¶30, 78, 301 Wis. 2d 350
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74805 - 2014-09-15
is the same under both lines of cases: de novo. See State v. Howell, 2007 WI 75, ¶¶30, 78, 301 Wis. 2d 350
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74805 - 2014-09-15
State v. Gabriel R.M.
of a statute and its application to undisputed facts presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10138 - 2005-03-31
of a statute and its application to undisputed facts presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10138 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jared J.
of a statute presents a question of law which we are to review de novo. See R.W.S. v. State, 156 Wis.2d 526
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12837 - 2005-03-31
of a statute presents a question of law which we are to review de novo. See R.W.S. v. State, 156 Wis.2d 526
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12837 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jared J.
of a statute presents a question of law which we are to review de novo. See R.W.S. v. State, 156 Wis.2d 526
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12836 - 2005-03-31
of a statute presents a question of law which we are to review de novo. See R.W.S. v. State, 156 Wis.2d 526
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12836 - 2005-03-31