Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16131 - 16140 of 64027 for records/1000.
Search results 16131 - 16140 of 64027 for records/1000.
[PDF]
Ervin Merten v. Carl Holzer
to their property by recording an “Affidavit as to Way of Necessity” (affidavit) across the entire Merten farm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11935 - 2017-09-21
to their property by recording an “Affidavit as to Way of Necessity” (affidavit) across the entire Merten farm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11935 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the record supplemented with a stipulation purportedly entered between Turner and the State regarding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=129358 - 2017-09-21
the record supplemented with a stipulation purportedly entered between Turner and the State regarding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=129358 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
fees. Based No. 2023AP1882 2 upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=826568 - 2024-07-17
fees. Based No. 2023AP1882 2 upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=826568 - 2024-07-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-CRNM 2 consideration of these submissions and an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116989 - 2017-09-21
-CRNM 2 consideration of these submissions and an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116989 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response. Counsel then filed a supplemental no-merit report. After reviewing the record, counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231724 - 2019-01-09
a response. Counsel then filed a supplemental no-merit report. After reviewing the record, counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231724 - 2019-01-09
State v. William W. Gandt
to a chemical test of his breath. The intoxilyzer test resulted in a reading of .13%. According to the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10434 - 2005-03-31
to a chemical test of his breath. The intoxilyzer test resulted in a reading of .13%. According to the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10434 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, I agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182147 - 2017-09-21
review of the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, I agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182147 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
when it considers the facts of record under the proper legal standard and reasons its way
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88620 - 2014-09-15
when it considers the facts of record under the proper legal standard and reasons its way
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88620 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conducting an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123241 - 2017-09-21
conducting an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123241 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and after conducting an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241339 - 2019-05-28
, and after conducting an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241339 - 2019-05-28