Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 16141 - 16150 of 30032 for consulta de causas.
Search results 16141 - 16150 of 30032 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
State v. Robert W. Sweat
construe § 973.20(14)(b), STATS.4 Statutory construction is a question of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9391 - 2017-09-19
construe § 973.20(14)(b), STATS.4 Statutory construction is a question of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9391 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 15
the circuit court’s application of constitutional principles to the findings of fact de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58245 - 2014-09-15
the circuit court’s application of constitutional principles to the findings of fact de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58245 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for de novo review by the circuit court, which dismissed the request as untimely. Brian did not appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=370198 - 2021-05-25
for de novo review by the circuit court, which dismissed the request as untimely. Brian did not appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=370198 - 2021-05-25
[PDF]
NOTICE
that an appellate court reviews de novo. State v. King, 175 Wis. 2d 146, 150, 499 N.W.2d 190 (Ct. App. 1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49203 - 2014-09-15
that an appellate court reviews de novo. State v. King, 175 Wis. 2d 146, 150, 499 N.W.2d 190 (Ct. App. 1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49203 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
, however, is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. ¶6 The remedy for a defendant who has been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30483 - 2014-09-15
, however, is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. ¶6 The remedy for a defendant who has been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30483 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Roland A. Smart
to seek de novo review. Id. at ¶6. The supreme court determined this distinction was without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4996 - 2017-09-19
to seek de novo review. Id. at ¶6. The supreme court determined this distinction was without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4996 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
County of Dane v. Jeffrey J. Mawhinney
). Whether the established facts constitute probable cause to arrest is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3675 - 2017-09-19
). Whether the established facts constitute probable cause to arrest is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3675 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Scott F. Anderson v. Circuit Court for Milwaukee County
contempt power. This is a legal question that this court reviews de novo. See Old Republic Sur. Co. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11699 - 2017-09-20
contempt power. This is a legal question that this court reviews de novo. See Old Republic Sur. Co. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11699 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“reviewed all the records for this account” and “ma[de] this Affidavit based upon personal knowledge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94377 - 2014-09-15
“reviewed all the records for this account” and “ma[de] this Affidavit based upon personal knowledge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94377 - 2014-09-15
State v. John D. Meindl
of a statute.[7] Statutory interpretation is a question of law, which we review de novo. County of Dane v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18687 - 2005-04-22
of a statute.[7] Statutory interpretation is a question of law, which we review de novo. County of Dane v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18687 - 2005-04-22